Orchard Supply Hardware LLC v. Home Depot USA, Inc. et al

Filing 62

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 60 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to Answer filed by Home Depot USA, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 16, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
ROXANE A. POLIDORA (CA Bar No. 135972)
[e-mail]
ANDREW D. LANPHERE (CA Bar No. 191479)
[e-mail]
LINDSAY A. LUTZ (CA Bar No. 254442)
[e-mail]
Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor
Post Office Box 2824
San Francisco, CA 94126-2824
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile No.: [phone]

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
HOME DEPOT USA, INC., MILWAUKEE )
ELECTRIC TOOL CORPORATION, and )
)
MAKITA USA, INC.,
)
Defendants.
)
)
ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE LLC,

Case No.: 12-CV-6361 JST
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
704849928_1.DOCX

-1-

STIPULATION EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND
Case No. 12-CV-6361 JST

1

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s September 19, 2013 Order Granting in Part and

2

Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 59), Defendant

3

Home Depot USA, Inc.’s answer to the Second Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff

4

Orchard Supply Hardware LLC on May 24, 2013 is currently due on October 18, 2013;

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Orchard Supply Hardware LLC filed a complaint in the
above-captioned case on December 14, 2012;
WHEREAS, Defendant has requested and Plaintiff has agreed to an additional two
weeks for Defendant to answer the Second Amended Complaint;
WHEREAS, Defendant has not previously requested an extension of the time to
answer;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and
among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, as follows:
Subject to the approval of the Court, the parties stipulate that Defendant’s answer to
the Second Amended Complaint shall be due on November 1, 2013.
Dated: October 15, 2013.

16
SO ORDERED:

17
18

The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
District Court Judge

19
20

October 16, 2013
Date Entered

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
704849928_1.DOCX

-2-

STIPULATION EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND
Case No. 12-CV-6361 JST

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
ROXANE A. POLIDORA
ANDREW D. LANPHERE
LINDSAY A. LUTZ
Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111

1
2
3
4
5

By:

/s/ Roxane A. Polidora
Roxane A. Polidora

6
7

Attorneys for Defendant
HOME DEPOT USA, INC.

8

12

LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM A. MARKHAM
WILLIAM A. MARKHAM (CA Bar No. 132970)
DORN GRAHAM BISHOP (CA Bar No. 147994)
550 West C Street, Suite 2040
San Diego, California 92101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

13

By:

9
10
11

/s/ William A. Markham
William A. Markham

14

Attorneys for Plaintiff ORCHARD SUPPLY
HARDWARE

15
16
17
18

ATTESTATION: Pursuant to to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in
the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories thereto.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
704849928_1.DOCX

-3-

STIPULATION EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND
Case No. 12-CV-6361 JST