Fuzzysharp Technologies Incorporated v. Nvidia Corporation
Filing
40
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 39 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO RESCHEDULE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Nvidia Corporation, Fuzzysharp Technologies Incorporated. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 30, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (STATE BAR NO. 173985)
nchatterjee@orrick.com
VICKIE L. FEEMAN (STATE BAR NO. 177487)
vfeeman@orrick.com
JESSE CHENG (STATE BAR NO. 259909)
jcheng@orrick.com
JAMES FREEDMAN (STATE BAR NO. 287177)
jfreedman@orrick.com
DAVID FINK (pro hac vice)
7519 Apache Plume
Houston, TX 77071
Tel.: (713) 729-4991
Fax.: (713) 729-4951
texascowboy6@gmail.com
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone:
+1-650-614-7400
Facsimile:
+1-650-614-7401
DUNCAN M. MCNEILL
1514 Van Dyke Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94124
Tel.: (650) 994-2295
Fax: (650) 994-2297
dmcneill1@netzero.com
Fed. Bar No. 136416
Attorneys for Defendant
NVIDIA CORPORATION
Attorneys for the Plaintiff
FuzzySharp Technologies Inc.
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
FUZZYSHARP TECHNOLOGIES, INC,
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
20
v.
Case No. 12-cv-6375-JST
STIPULATED REQUEST AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO
RESCHEDULE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
NVIDIA CORPORATION,
Defendant.
21
22
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff FuzzySharp Technologies Incorporated
23
(“Fuzzysharp”) and Defendant NVIDIA Corporation (“NVIDIA”) respectfully submit this
24
Stipulated Request to reschedule the initial Case Management Conference set for August 14,
25
2013, pending the Court’s resolution of NVIDIA’s Motion to Dismiss Fuzzysharp’s Amended
26
Complaint. Certain deadlines that trigger off of this initial Case Management Conference as set
27
forth in the Civil and Patent Local Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will be continued
28
accordingly. No other deadlines should be affected.
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VALLEY
STIP. REQUEST TO RESCHEDULE INITIAL CMC
12-CV-6375-JST
1
The initial Case Management Conference was originally scheduled for March 22, 2013
2
(Docket Nos. 3 and 10), vacated by the Court’s Reassignment Order (Docket No. 13), and reset
3
for March 26, 2013 (Docket No. 20). The Court has since rescheduled the Case Management
4
Conference for May 15, 2013, in response to the parties’ first stipulated request, and subsequently
5
for June 26, 2013, in response to an unopposed motion by Fuzzysharp. On June 5, 2013, the
6
Court continued the Case Management Conference until August 14, 2013.
7
Subject to the convenience of the Court, the parties respectfully request that the initial
8
Case Management Conference be rescheduled for a date following the resolution of NVIDIA’s
9
Motion to Dismiss Fuzzysharp’s Amended Complaint. The parties believe that greater certainty
10
as to the scope of this case would allow them to better prepare for a Case Management
11
Conference and its related deadlines and submissions, to the extent necessary.
12
13
Counsel for Fuzzysharp is unavailable in September due to Jewish Holidays, as well as
October 2 and 9, 2013. Counsel for NVIDIA is unavailable on October 16.
14
15
Dated: July 29, 2013
16
Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP
17
By:
18
19
/s/ Jesse Cheng
Jesse Cheng
Attorneys for Defendant
NVIDIA Corp.
Dated: July 29, 2013
By:
/s/ David Fink
David Fink
Attorney for Plaintiff
Fuzzysharp Technologies Inc.
20
21
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), counsel for NVIDIA has obtained the concurrence
22
of Fuzzysharp’s counsel in the filing of this Stipulated Request.
23
Dated: July 29, 2013
By:
/s/ Jesse Cheng
Jesse Cheng
24
Attorneys for Defendant
NVIDIA Corp.
25
26
27
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated: July 30, 2013
Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
28
ORRICK, HERRINGTON &
SUTCLIFFE LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VALLEY
-2-
STIP. REQUEST TO RESCHEDULE INITIAL CMC
12-CV-6375-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?