Cox v. General Mills, Inc.

Filing 21

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS by Judge Alsup denying 15 Motion for Pro Hac Vice; denying 16 Motion for Pro Hac Vice (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ELIZABETH COX,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

No. C 12-06377 WHA

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC
VICE APPLICATIONS

13

GENERAL MILLS, INC.,

14

Defendant.
/

15
16

The pro hac vice application of Attorneys Sipos and Roos (Dkt. Nos. 15–16) are DENIED

17

because the certificates of good standing do not match the declarations. While the application

18

fees does not need to be paid again, the applications cannot be processed until corrected forms

19

are submitted.

20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: February 25, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE