Cox v. General Mills, Inc.
Filing
21
ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS by Judge Alsup denying 15 Motion for Pro Hac Vice; denying 16 Motion for Pro Hac Vice (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ELIZABETH COX,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
No. C 12-06377 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER DENYING PRO HAC
VICE APPLICATIONS
13
GENERAL MILLS, INC.,
14
Defendant.
/
15
16
The pro hac vice application of Attorneys Sipos and Roos (Dkt. Nos. 15–16) are DENIED
17
because the certificates of good standing do not match the declarations. While the application
18
fees does not need to be paid again, the applications cannot be processed until corrected forms
19
are submitted.
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: February 25, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?