Anderson et al v. National Football League Management Council et al

Filing 27

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE CASES SHOULD NOT BE CONSOLIDATED Show Cause Response due by 2/27/2013.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 2/25/2013. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 12 13 Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, et al., 14 Defendants. / 15 16 No. C 12-06415 WHA AARON SCHOBEL, et al. Plaintiffs, 17 18 19 20 No. C 12-06386 WHA COURTNEY ANDERSON, et al., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE CASES SHOULD NOT BE CONSOLIDATED v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, et al., Defendants. / 21 22 By order dated February 22, the above-captioned actions were related and assigned to the 23 undersigned judge. Plaintiffs in both actions are former National Football League players who 24 filed suit to vacate an arbitration award in favor of defendants National Football League 25 Management Council, Buffalo Bills, Denver Broncos, New York Giants and Philadelphia 26 Eagles. The parties participated in a consolidated arbitration before Arbitrator Michael Beck, 27 who issued one award on December 12, 2012. Defendants have filed a motion to consolidate the 28 two actions for all purposes pursuant to Rule 42(a). The two complaints were filed on the same day and appear to be nearly identical copies of each other, albeit brought by different plaintiffs. 1 Defendants assert that plaintiffs do not oppose consolidation, but have not submitted any 2 evidence in support of this statement. 3 Given the similarity of the two complaints, the Court is inclined to grant defendants’ 4 motion for consolidation for all purposes. Plaintiffs are hereby ordered to respond to the motion 5 stating whether or not they oppose consolidation and, if they oppose, their reasons therefor. 6 Plaintiffs’ response(s) are due by FEBRUARY 27 AT NOON. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: February 25, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?