Anderson et al v. National Football League Management Council et al
Filing
27
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE CASES SHOULD NOT BE CONSOLIDATED Show Cause Response due by 2/27/2013.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 2/25/2013. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
12
13
Plaintiffs,
v.
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, et al.,
14
Defendants.
/
15
16
No. C 12-06415 WHA
AARON SCHOBEL, et al.
Plaintiffs,
17
18
19
20
No. C 12-06386 WHA
COURTNEY ANDERSON, et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
THE CASES SHOULD NOT
BE CONSOLIDATED
v.
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, et al.,
Defendants.
/
21
22
By order dated February 22, the above-captioned actions were related and assigned to the
23
undersigned judge. Plaintiffs in both actions are former National Football League players who
24
filed suit to vacate an arbitration award in favor of defendants National Football League
25
Management Council, Buffalo Bills, Denver Broncos, New York Giants and Philadelphia
26
Eagles. The parties participated in a consolidated arbitration before Arbitrator Michael Beck,
27
who issued one award on December 12, 2012. Defendants have filed a motion to consolidate the
28
two actions for all purposes pursuant to Rule 42(a). The two complaints were filed on the same
day and appear to be nearly identical copies of each other, albeit brought by different plaintiffs.
1
Defendants assert that plaintiffs do not oppose consolidation, but have not submitted any
2
evidence in support of this statement.
3
Given the similarity of the two complaints, the Court is inclined to grant defendants’
4
motion for consolidation for all purposes. Plaintiffs are hereby ordered to respond to the motion
5
stating whether or not they oppose consolidation and, if they oppose, their reasons therefor.
6
Plaintiffs’ response(s) are due by FEBRUARY 27 AT NOON.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated: February 25, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?