Anderson et al v. National Football League Management Council et al

Filing 49

TENTATIVE CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 4/10/2013. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 COURTNEY ANDERSON, JOE BURNS, MARK CAMPBELL, JAMES COTTON, KAHLIL HILL, ERICK KING, JERREL MYERS, P.K. SAM, MARK WORD, ROC ALEXANDER, MATTHIAS ASKEW, STEVE CARGILE, MARCO COLEMAN, PAUL ERNSTER, QUENTIN HARRIS, T.J. HOLLOWELL, KENARD LANG, GLENN MARTINEZ, ALVIN MCKINLEY, CHAD MUSTARD, DARRELL REID, JACOB ROGERS, NATE WEBSTER, JAMIE INBORN, KENDRICK ALLEN, TIM CARTER, SAMMY KNIGHT, BOB WHITFIELD, BRANDON CHILDLESS, JEROME MCDOUGLE, TODD PINKSTON, J.R. REED, ISAIAH REESE, and THOMAS TAPEH, 17 18 19 20 21 24 Consolidated with: No. C 12-06415 WHA No. C 13-00882 WHA TENTATIVE CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Plaintiffs/Petitioners, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE MANAGEMENT COUNCIL, BUFFALO BILLS, DENVER BRONCOS, NEW YORK GIANTS, and PHILADELPHIA EAGLES, Defendants/Respondents. / 22 23 No. C 12-06386 WHA At tomorrow’s case management conference, the Court tentatively plans to set the following schedule: 25 26 April 25, 2013 Motion to Enforce (total 25 pages) 27 May 9, 2013 Opposition to Motion to Enforce and Motion to Vacate (total 25 pages) 28 1 May 16, 2013 Reply to Motion to Enforce and Opposition to Motion to Vacate (fifteen pages) May 23, 2013 Reply to Motion to Vacate (fifteen pages) June 8, 2013 Hearing (if needed) 2 3 4 5 Please be prepared to address. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: April 10, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?