Crockett v. Rash Curtis & Associates

Filing 14

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AND VACATING HEARING by Hon. William Alsup denying 10 Motion to Dismiss.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DIANA CROCKETT,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.

17

ORDER DENYING MOTION
TO DISMISS AND VACATING
HEARING

RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES,
Defendant.
/

15
16

No. C 12-06429 WHA

Because plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, defendant’s pending motion to dismiss
is DENIED AS MOOT. The hearing on February 14 is VACATED.

18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: January 30, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE