Crockett v. Rash Curtis & Associates

Filing 18

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Hon. William Alsup [denying 17 Motion to Appear by Telephone].(whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 DIANA CROCKETT, No. C 12-06429 WHA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. Defendant. / 15 16 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES, The courtroom telephone equipment makes it difficult to conduct hearings by phone, so 17 plaintiff’s request to appear by telephone is DENIED. Since there is currently a hearing set for 18 MARCH 21, 2013, AT 8:00 A.M., on defendant’s motion to dismiss, the Court CONTINUES the 19 case management conference to said date and time. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 7, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?