Crockett v. Rash Curtis & Associates
Filing
18
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Hon. William Alsup [denying 17 Motion to Appear by Telephone].(whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DIANA CROCKETT,
No. C 12-06429 WHA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
Defendant.
/
15
16
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES,
The courtroom telephone equipment makes it difficult to conduct hearings by phone, so
17
plaintiff’s request to appear by telephone is DENIED. Since there is currently a hearing set for
18
MARCH 21, 2013, AT 8:00 A.M., on defendant’s motion to dismiss, the Court CONTINUES the
19
case management conference to said date and time.
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: February 7, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?