Crockett v. Rash Curtis & Associates

Filing 18

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Hon. William Alsup [denying 17 Motion to Appear by Telephone].(whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DIANA CROCKETT,
No. C 12-06429 WHA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.

Defendant.
/

15
16

ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES,

The courtroom telephone equipment makes it difficult to conduct hearings by phone, so

17

plaintiff’s request to appear by telephone is DENIED. Since there is currently a hearing set for

18

MARCH 21, 2013, AT 8:00 A.M., on defendant’s motion to dismiss, the Court CONTINUES the

19

case management conference to said date and time.

20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: February 7, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE