Howe v. Bank of America, N.A. (USA)

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 Stipulation filed by GMAC Mortgage USA Corporation to Extend GMAC Mortgage, LLC and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s Time to Respond to the Initial Complaint Per L.R. 6-1(a). Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/28/2013. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2013)

Download PDF
1 EDWARD R. BUELL, III (State Bar No. 240494) erb@severson.com 2 REBECCA S. SAELAO (State Bar No. 222731) rss@severson.com 3 SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation 4 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94111 5 Telephone: (415) 398-3344 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439 6 Attorneys for Defendants 7 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, and GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, 8 incorrectly sued as GMAC Mortgage USA Corporation 9 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 10 DIANE L. WEBB, State Bar No. 197851 NICOLE R. SADLER, State Bar No. 275333 11 One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, California 94105-1126 12 Telephone: 415.442.1000 Facsimile: 415.442.1001 13 dwebb@morganlewis.com nsadler@morganlewis.com 14 Attorneys for Defendant 15 J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 16 for itself and as acquirer of certain assets and liabilities, incorrectly sued as JPMorgan Chase N.A., 17 as successor to Washington Mutual FSB 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 KARINA L. HOWE, et al., Plaintiffs, 23 24 vs. 25 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (USA), et al., Case No. 3:12-cv-06435-JCS STIPULATION TO EXTEND GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC AND J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.’S TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT PER LOCAL RULE 6-1(a) AND ORDER Defendants. 26 Judge: Hon. Joseph C. Spero 27 28 19000.1465/2582526.2 3:12-cv-06435-JCS 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND JPMC AND GMACM'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), plaintiffs and defendants GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, 2 incorrectly sued as GMAC Mortgage USA Corporation (“GMACM”) and J.P. Morgan Chase 3 Bank, N.A., for itself and as acquirer of certain assets and liabilities, incorrectly sued as JPMorgan 4 Chase N.A., as successor to Washington Mutual FSB (collectively, “JPMC”), through their 5 respective counsel of record herein, agree and stipulate as follows: 6 GMACM and JPMC shall have through and including April 2, 2013, to answer, move, or 7 otherwise respond to plaintiffs’ complaint. 8 This stipulation does not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by the Court. 9 WHEREFORE, the parties agree and stipulate that JPMC and GMACM shall have through 10 and including April 2, 2013, to answer, move, or otherwise respond to plaintiffs’ complaint. 11 DATED: February 27, 2013 12 13 SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation By: 14 /s/ Rebecca S. Saelao Rebecca S. Saelao Attorneys for Defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, and GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, incorrectly sued as GMAC Mortgage USA Corporation 15 16 17 18 DATED: February 27, 2013 MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 19 By: 20 21 Attorneys for Defendant J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., for itself and as acquirer of certain assets and liabilities, incorrectly sued as JPMorgan Chase N.A., as successor to Washington Mutual FSB 22 23 24 /s/ Diane L. Webb Diane L. Webb DATED: February 27, 2013 THE WADSWORTH FIRM 25 By: 26 27 /s/ Joel S. Wadsworth Joel S. Wadsworth (pro hac vice) Attorneys for Plaintiffs 28 19000.1465/2582526.2 3:12-cv-06435-JCS 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND JPMC AND GMACM'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1 I, Rebecca S. Saelao, am the ECF user whose identification and password were used to file 2 this Stipulation. I hereby attest that Diane L. Webb and Joel S. Wadsworth concur in this filing. 3 /s/ seph Judge Jo TED 9 RT ER 11 A H 10 o C. Sper LI 8 R NIA S UNIT ED 7 GRAN NO 6 Date: February 28, 2013 RT U O 5 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 4 Rebecca S. Saelao N F D IS T IC T O R C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19000.1465/2582526.2 3:12-cv-06435-JCS 3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND JPMC AND GMACM'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?