Sage Electrochromics, Inc. v. View, Inc.
Filing
63
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 62 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulated Protective Order filed by Sage Electrochromics, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 2, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
TERRENCE P. MCMAHON (SBN: 71910)
TERRY W. AHEARN (SBN: 216543)
McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100
Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004
Tel: (650) 815 7400
Fax: (650) 815 7401
tmcmahon@mwe.com
tahearn@mwe.com
SARAH CHAPIN COLUMBIA (pro hac vice)
LEIGH MARTINSON (pro hac vice)
HASAN M RASHID (pro hac vice)
McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
28 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Tel: (617) 535-4000
Fax: (617) 535-3800
scolumbia@mwe.com
lmartinson@mwe.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Counterclaim
Defendant SAGE Electrochromics, Inc.
15
16
WILLIAM F. LEE (pro hac vice)
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE
AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Tel: (617) 526-6000
Fax: (617) 526-5000
William.Lee@wilmerhale.com
Attorneys for Defendant-Counterclaimant
View, Inc.
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
20
KEITH SLENKOVICH (SBN: 129793)
JOSEPH F. HAAG (SBN: 248749)
RUSSELL TONKOVICH (SBN: 233280)
TOBY MOCK (SBN: 265004)
CRYSTAL ROBERTS (SBN: 284622)
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE
AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Tel: (650) 858-6000
Fax: (650) 858-6100
Keith.Slenkovich@wilmerhale.com
Joseph.Haag@wilmerhale.com
Russell.Tonkovich@wilmerhale.com
Tobias.Mock@wilmerhale.com
Crystal.Roberts@wilmerhale.com
SAGE ELECTROCHROMICS, INC.
21
Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant,
Case No. 12-cv-06441-JST
vs.
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER
22
23
24
25
VIEW, INC.
Defendant-Counterclaimant.
26
27
28
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-cv-06441-JST
1
1.
PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
2
Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of
3
confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public
4
disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted.
5
Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following
6
Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket
7
protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from
8
public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to
9
confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as
10
set forth in Section 14.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file
11
confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62 set forth the
12
procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks
13
permission from the court to file material under seal.
14
2.
15
16
17
18
19
DEFINITIONS
2.1
Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of
information or items under this Order.
2.2
Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as
well as their support staff).
2.3
Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that
20
it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
21
TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL NON-
22
TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE
23
CODE – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”.
24
2.4
Designated House Counsel: no more than one (1) House Counsel per party who
25
seeks access to “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,”
26
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL NON-TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or
27
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information in
28
this matter and to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, provided that
-1STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
Designated House Counsel (1) has no involvement in competitive decision-making for a Party or
2
a Party’s corporate affiliate or parent entity, as defined in U.S. Steel Corp. v. U.S., 730 F.2d
3
1465, 1468 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 1984); (2) is not involved in patent prosecution and does not actively
4
manage patent prosecution relating to electrochromic glass and methods for manufacturing the
5
same in accordance with Section 8 of this Protective Order; (3) has signed the “Acknowledgment
6
and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); and (4) as to whom the procedures set forth in Section
7
7.5 have otherwise been followed.
8
9
2.5
Specially Designated House Counsel: no more than one (1) House Counsel per
party who seeks access solely to “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL NON-TECHNICAL –
10
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information in this matter and to whom disclosure is reasonably
11
necessary for this litigation, provided that Specially Designated House Counsel (1) has no
12
involvement in competitive decision-making for a Party or a Party’s corporate affiliate or parent
13
entity, as defined in U.S. Steel Corp. v. U.S., 730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 1984); (2) has
14
signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); and (3) as to whom the
15
procedures set forth in Section 7.5 have otherwise been followed.
16
2.6
Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the
17
medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things,
18
testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or
19
responses to discovery in this matter.
20
2.7
Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to
21
the litigation who (a) has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or
22
as a consultant in this action, (b) is not a past or current officer, director, or employee of a Party
23
or of a Party’s competitor, and (c) at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an
24
officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a Party’s competitor. Nothing in this order
25
purports to change the requirements for offering testimony under Fed. R. Evid. 703, or to define
26
the term “expert” for purposes other than those addressed in this Protective Order. Support staff
27
working at the direction of such experts or consultants where disclosure is reasonably necessary
28
in order for such experts or consultants to perform the duties for which they have been retained
-2STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
2
may have access to Protected Material.
2.8
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”
3
Information or Items: sensitive confidential technical information or tangible things (regardless
4
of how it is generated, stored or maintained) that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of
5
Civil Procedure 26(c) that discloses technical information or technical descriptions regarding the
6
Parties’ products, methods or processes, the disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party
7
would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive
8
means. Technical documentation and embodiments of the parties’ products and methods,
9
including, but not limited to, product samples, shall presumptively fall within this category of
10
protection.
11
2.9
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL NON-TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES
12
ONLY” Information or Items: sensitive confidential information or tangible things (regardless of
13
how it is generated, stored or maintained) that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil
14
Procedure 26(c) that discloses information, the disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party
15
would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive
16
means. Financial information, marketing information, sales data, licensing and other
17
agreements, and email correspondence of a non-technical nature shall presumptively fall within
18
this category of protection.
19
2.10
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”
20
Information or Items: extremely sensitive confidential information or tangible items representing
21
computer code and associated comments and revision histories that define or otherwise describe
22
in detail the algorithms or structure of software designs, the disclosure of which to another Party
23
or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less
24
restrictive means.
25
2.11
House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party or a Party’s corporate
26
affiliate or parent entity or who are an independent contractor of a Party or a Party’s corporate
27
affiliate or parent entity who provides legal advice on an exclusive basis to that Party. House
28
Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.
-3STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
2
2.12
Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal
entity not named as a Party to this action.
3
2.13
Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this
4
action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this
5
action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of
6
that party, and paralegal and legal support staff working at the direction of such attorneys.
7
8
2.14
consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs).
9
10
Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees,
2.15
Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery
Material in this action.
11
2.16
Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services
12
(e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and
13
organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium; jury consulting, mock trial
14
coordination) and their employees and subcontractors.
15
2.17
Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as
16
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” “HIGHLY
17
CONFIDENTIAL NON-TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY
18
CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
19
2.18
Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a
20
Producing Party.
21
3.
22
SCOPE
The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material
23
(as defined above), but also (a) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (b)
24
all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (c) any testimony,
25
conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.
26
However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the
27
following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure
28
to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving
-4STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part
2
of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving
3
Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source
4
who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the
5
Designating Party.
6
4.
DURATION
7
Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by
8
this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court
9
order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (a) dismissal of all
10
claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (b) final judgment herein after
11
the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this
12
action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time
13
pursuant to applicable law.
14
5.
DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
15
5.1
16
Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this
17
Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the
18
appropriate standards. Mass, indiscriminate or routinized designations are prohibited.
19
Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper
20
purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose
21
unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions.
22
Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection.
If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated
23
for protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not qualify for the level of protection
24
initially asserted, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other parties that it is
25
withdrawing the mistaken designation.
26
5.2
Manner and Timing of Designations.
27
Except as otherwise provided in this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of Section 5.2(a)
28
below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for
-5STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or
2
produced. Designation in conformity with this Order requires:
3
(a)
for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents,
4
but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing
5
Party affix the legend “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES
6
ONLY,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL NON-TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or
7
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” conspicuously
8
to each page that contains protected material.
9
A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for
10
inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated
11
which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the
12
designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY
13
CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party
14
has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine
15
which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before
16
producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend
17
(“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” “HIGHLY
18
CONFIDENTIAL NON-TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY
19
CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) to each page that
20
contains Protected Material.
21
(b)
for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings,
22
that the Designating Party identify on the record during the deposition, or in writing up to
23
twenty-one (21) days thereafter, the specific portions of the transcript that should be treated as
24
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” “HIGHLY
25
CONFIDENTIAL NON-TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY
26
CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or in the alternative
27
whether the transcript should be so designated in its entirety. Transcripts containing Protected
28
Material shall have an obvious legend on the title page that the transcript contains Protected
-6STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
Material, and, unless designated in its entirety, the title page shall be followed by a list of all
2
pages (including line numbers as appropriate) that have been designated as Protected Material
3
and the level of protection being asserted by the Designating Party. The Designating Party shall
4
inform the court reporter of these requirements. Any transcript that is prepared before the
5
expiration of a 21-day period for designation shall be treated during that period as if it had been
6
designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” in its
7
entirety unless otherwise agreed. After the expiration of that period, the transcript shall be
8
treated only as actually designated. In the event the deposition is videotaped, the original and
9
all copies of the videotape shall be marked by the video technician to indicate that the contents
10
of the videotape are subject to this Protective Order, substantially along the lines of “This
11
videotape contains confidential testimony used in this case and is not to be viewed or the
12
contents thereof to be displayed or revealed except pursuant to the terms of the operative
13
Protective Order in this matter or pursuant to written stipulation of the parties.” Counsel for any
14
Designating Party shall have the right to exclude from oral depositions, other than the deponent,
15
deponent's counsel, the reporter and videographer (if any), any person who is not authorized by
16
this Protective Order to receive or access Protected Material based on the designation of such
17
Protected Material. Such right of exclusion shall be applicable only during periods of
18
examination or testimony regarding such Protected Material.
19
(c)
for information produced in some form other than documentary and for
20
any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of
21
the medium, container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend
22
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” “HIGHLY
23
CONFIDENTIAL NON-TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY
24
CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” except that tangible
25
samples of accused products or other instrumentalities exchanged between the parties (if any),
26
shall presumptively be treated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’
27
EYES ONLY,” whether or not such a legend is affixed thereto.
28
-7STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
5.3
2
If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or items does
3
not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for
4
such material. Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make
5
reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this
6
Order. The Designating Party shall provide substitute copies of documents bearing the
7
confidentiality designation. Upon receiving substitute copies, the Receiving Party shall return or
8
securely destroy, at the Designating Party’s option, all material that was not designated properly.
9
6.
Inadvertent Failures to Designate.
CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
10
6.1
Timing of Challenges.
11
Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of confidentiality at any time.
12
Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality designation is necessary to
13
avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a significant
14
disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality
15
designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is
16
disclosed.
17
6.2
18
The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution process by providing written
Meet and Confer.
19
notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis for each challenge. To avoid
20
ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written notice must recite that the
21
challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this specific paragraph of the
22
Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in good faith and must
23
begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other forms of
24
communication are not sufficient) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In conferring,
25
the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was
26
not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material,
27
to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis
28
for the chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge
-8STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first or establishes that the
2
Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in a timely manner.
3
6.3
4
If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court intervention, the party seeking to
Judicial Intervention.
5
challenge a designation may move for appropriate relief under Civil Local Rule 7 (and in
6
compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62, if applicable) within twenty-one
7
(21) days of the initial notice of challenge or within fourteen (14) days of the parties agreeing
8
that the meet and confer process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Each such
9
motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied
10
with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph. Failure by the
11
Designating Party to make such a motion including the required declaration within twenty-one
12
(21) days (or fourteen (14) days, if applicable) shall automatically waive the contesting party’s
13
challenge to the confidentiality designation. Throughout the pendency of any such challenge, the
14
all parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is
15
entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the court rules on the challenge.
16
7.
ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
17
7.1
Basic Principles.
18
A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or produced by another
19
Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or
20
attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the
21
categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has
22
been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of Section 15 below
23
(FINAL DISPOSITION).
24
Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and
25
in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order.
26
Nothing in this Order shall be construed as limiting a Designating Party’s use of its own
27
Protected Material
28
7.2
Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL NON-TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’
-9STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
2
EYES ONLY” Information or Items.
Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a
3
Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
4
NON-TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to:
5
(a)
the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action;
6
(b)
Designated House Counsel and Specially Designated House Counsel;
7
(c)
Experts of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary
8
for this litigation and who have signed and provided to the Producing Party an executed copy of
9
the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A) prior to receiving Protected
10
Material;
11
(d)
the court and its personnel;
12
(e)
any designated arbitrator or mediator who is assigned to hear this matter,
13
14
15
16
or who has been selected by the Parties, and his or her staff;
(f)
court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and
Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation;
(g)
during their depositions and/or at trial, witnesses in the action to whom
17
disclosure is reasonably necessary and who are either (1) a present director, officer, and/or
18
employee of the Designating Party (for avoidance of doubt, a party that produces a third party’s
19
confidential documents that previously were obtained by the producing party in litigation, via
20
subpoena or other discovery, is not the “Designating Party”); (2) a former director, officer, agent,
21
consultant and/or employee of the designating party, and who had access to the information that
22
is disclosed during the course of his or her association with the Designating Party; or (3) a
23
30(b)(6) witness of the Designating Party. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits
24
to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and
25
may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order;
26
27
28
(h)
the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a
custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information;
(i)
any other person with the prior written consent of the Producing Party.
-10STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
7.3
Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’
2
EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE – ATTORNEYS’ EYES
3
ONLY,” Information or Items.
4
Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a
5
Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
6
TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE
7
CODE – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to:
8
(a)
the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action;
9
(b)
Designated House Counsel (and expressly excluding Specially Designated
10
House Counsel) ;
11
(c)
Experts of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary
12
for this litigation and who have signed and provided to the Producing Party an executed copy of
13
the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A) prior to receiving Protected
14
Material, and as to whom the procedures set forth in paragraph 7.4 have been followed;
15
(d)
the court and its personnel;
16
(e)
any designated arbitrator or mediator who is assigned to hear this matter,
17
18
19
20
or who has been selected by the Parties, and his or her staff;
(f)
court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and
Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation;
(g)
during their depositions and/or at trial, witnesses in the action to whom
21
disclosure is reasonably necessary and who are either (1) a present director, officer, and/or
22
employee of the Designating Party (for avoidance of doubt, a party that produces a third party’s
23
confidential documents that previously were obtained by the producing party in litigation, via
24
subpoena or other discovery, is not the “Designating Party”); (2) a former director, officer, agent,
25
consultant and/or employee of the designating party, and who had access to the information that
26
is disclosed during the course of his or her association with the Designating Party; or (3) a
27
30(b)(6) witness of the Designating Party. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits
28
to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and
-11STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order;
2
3
(h)
custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information; and
4
5
the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a
(i)
7.4
any other person with the prior written consent of the Producing Party.
Procedures for Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL –
6
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL NON-TECHNICAL –
7
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE –
8
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” Information or Items to Experts.
9
(a)
Unless otherwise ordered by the court or agreed to in writing by the
10
Designating Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to an Expert (as defined in this Order) any
11
information or item that has been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL –
12
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL NON-TECHNICAL –
13
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE –
14
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” pursuant to paragraphs 7.2(c) and 7.3(c) by an opposing party
15
must first make a written request to the Designating Party that (1) sets forth the full name of the
16
Expert and the city and state of his or her primary residence; (2) attaches a copy of the Expert’s
17
current resume; (3) identifies the Expert’s current employer(s); (4) identifies each person or
18
entity from whom the Expert has received compensation or funding for work in his or her areas
19
of expertise or to whom the expert has provided professional services, including in connection
20
with a litigation, at any time during the preceding five (5) years; and (5) identifies (by name and
21
number of the case, filing date, and location of court) any litigation in connection with which the
22
Expert has offered expert testimony, including through a declaration, report, or testimony at a
23
deposition or trial, during the preceding five (5) years. The Party that seeks to make such
24
disclosure to an expert of any information or item that has been designated Protected Material
25
need not identify to the Designating Party the information or items to be disclosed.
26
(b)
A Party that makes a request and provides the information specified in the
27
preceding respective paragraphs may disclose the subject Protected Material to the identified
28
Expert unless, within seven (7) business days of delivering the request, the Party receives a
-12STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
written objection from the Designating Party. Any such objection must be for good cause and set
2
forth in detail the grounds on which it is based. In the absence of an objection at the end of the
3
seven (7) day period, the Expert shall be deemed approved under this Protective Order.
4
(c)
A Party that receives a timely written objection must meet and confer with
5
the Designating Party (through direct voice to voice dialogue) to try to resolve the matter by
6
agreement within three (3) days of the written objection. If no agreement is reached, the Party
7
seeking to make the disclosure to the Expert may file a motion as provided in Civil Local Rule 7
8
(and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62, if applicable) seeking
9
permission from the court to do so within seven (7) days from the date of the meet and confer.
10
Any such motion must describe the circumstances with specificity, set forth in detail the reasons
11
why the disclosure to the Expert is reasonably necessary, assess the risk of harm that the
12
disclosure would entail, and suggest any additional means that could be used to reduce that risk.
13
In addition, any such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration describing the
14
parties’ efforts to resolve the matter by agreement (i.e., the extent and the content of the meet and
15
confer discussions) and setting forth the reasons advanced by the Designating Party for its refusal
16
to approve the disclosure. If relief is sought, designated material shall not be disclosed to the
17
Expert in question until the Court resolves the objection.
18
In any such proceeding, the Party opposing disclosure to an Expert shall bear the burden
19
of proving that the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail (under the safeguards proposed)
20
outweighs the Receiving Party’s need to disclose the Protected Material to its Expert.
21
7.5
Procedures for Approving Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
22
TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL NON-
23
TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE
24
CODE – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” Information or Items to Designated House Counsel and
25
Specially Designated House Counsel.
26
(a)
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or agreed in writing by the
27
Designating Party, a Party that seeks to designate a Designated House Counsel or Specially
28
Designated House Counsel, or replace its existing Designated House Counsel or Specially
-13STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
Designated House Counsel with a new designee, must first make a written request to the
2
Designating Party that (1) sets forth the full name of the House Counsel; (2) the city and state of
3
his or her primary residence; (3) identifies the House Counsel’s current employer, job title, and
4
description of job responsibilities; and (4) indicates whether the House Counsel is being
5
proposed as either Designated House Counsel or Specially Designated House Counsel.
6
(b)
A Party that makes a request and provides the information specified in the
7
preceding paragraph may disclose Protected Material to the identified House Counsel unless,
8
within seven (7) business days of delivering the request, the Party receives a written objection
9
from the Designating Party. Any such objection must set forth in detail the grounds on which it is
10
based.
11
(c)
A Party that receives a timely written objection must meet and confer with
12
the Designating Party (through direct voice to voice dialogue) to try to resolve the matter by
13
agreement. If no agreement is reached, the Party seeking to make the disclosure to the House
14
Counsel may file a motion as provided in Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local
15
Rule 79-5, if applicable) seeking permission from the court to do so. Any such motion must
16
describe the circumstances with specificity, set forth in detail the reasons for which the
17
disclosure to the House Counsel is reasonably necessary, assess the risk of harm that the
18
disclosure would entail and suggest any additional means that might be used to reduce that risk.
19
In addition, any such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration in which the
20
movant describes the parties’ efforts to resolve the matter by agreement (i.e., the extent and the
21
content of the meet and confer discussions) and sets forth the reasons advanced by the
22
Designating Party for its refusal to approve the disclosure. Alternatively, the parties may raise
23
with the appointed Magistrate Judge, and the Magistrate Judge may approve and/or Order, an
24
alternative or expedited procedure for resolving any disagreements regarding disclosure to House
25
Counsel.
26
27
(d)
In any such proceeding the Party opposing disclosure to the House
Counsel shall bear the burden of proving that the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail
28
-14STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
(under the safeguards proposed) outweighs the Receiving Party’s need to disclose the Protected
2
Material to the proposed House Counsel.
3
4
7.6
Disclosure of Third Party Materials, Or Materials Subject to Protective Orders In
Other Litigation.
5
In the event that a Party reasonably believes that, due to a confidentiality obligation
6
owed to a nonparty, it cannot produce certain information (“Restricted Information”) in this
7
action, said Party shall within seven (7) days of discovering such obligation: (1) provide written
8
notification to the nonparty that Restricted Information is subject to disclosure in this action; and
9
(2) provide the nonparty with a copy of this Order. No more than ten (10) business days after
10
making such notification, the Party in possession of the Restricted Information shall inform the
11
Party requesting such information of the third party’s response to the notification, or lack thereof.
12
8.
13
PROSECUTION BAR
Absent written consent from the Producing Party, any individual who receives access to
14
an adverse party’s “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”
15
or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” information
16
shall not be involved in the prosecution of patents or patent applications relating to
17
electrochromic glass and methods for manufacturing the same, including without limitation the
18
patents asserted in this action and any patent or application claiming priority to or otherwise
19
related to the patents asserted in this action, before any foreign or domestic agency, including the
20
United States Patent and Trademark Office (“the Patent Office”). For purposes of this paragraph,
21
“prosecution” includes drafting, amending, or advising regarding the drafting or amending of
22
patent claims. To avoid any doubt, “prosecution” as used in this paragraph does not include
23
representing a party in connection with a challenge to a patent before a domestic or foreign
24
agency (including, but not limited to, a reissue proceeding, ex parte reexamination, inter partes
25
reexamination, inter partes review, or other post-grant review), as long as the individual is not
26
involved in directly or indirectly drafting, amending, or advising regarding the drafting or
27
amending of patent claims. This Prosecution Bar shall begin when access to “HIGHLY
28
CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY
-15STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” information is first
2
received by the affected individual and shall end one (1) year after final termination of this
3
action.
4
9.
5
SOURCE CODE
(a)
To the extent production of source code becomes necessary in this case, a
6
Producing Party may designate source code as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE -
7
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” if it comprises or includes confidential, proprietary or trade
8
secret source code.
9
(b)
Protected Material designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE
10
CODE - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” shall be subject to all of the protections afforded to
11
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information, and
12
may be disclosed only to the individuals to whom “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL –
13
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information may be disclosed, as set forth in Paragraphs 7.3 and
14
7.4.
15
(c)
Any source code produced in discovery shall be made available for
16
inspection, in a format allowing it to be reasonably reviewed and searched, during normal
17
business hours or at other mutually agreeable times, at an office of the Producing Party’s counsel
18
or another mutually agreed upon location. If in electronic form, the source code shall be made
19
available for inspection on a secured computer in a secured room without Internet access or
20
network access to other computers, and the Receiving Party shall not copy, remove, or otherwise
21
transfer any portion of the source code onto any recordable media or recordable device (except
22
as provided below). The Producing Party may visually monitor the activities of the Receiving
23
Party’s representatives during any source code review, but only to ensure that there is no
24
unauthorized recording, copying, or transmission of the source code.
25
(d)
The Receiving Party may request or print on-site paper copies of limited
26
portions of source code that are reasonably necessary for the preparation of court filings,
27
pleadings, expert reports, or other papers, or for deposition or trial, but shall not request or print
28
on-site paper copies for the purpose of reviewing the source code in the first instance. The
-16STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
Producing Party shall provide all such source code in paper form including bates numbers and
2
the label “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” The
3
Producing Party may challenge the amount of source code requested in hard copy form pursuant
4
to the dispute resolution procedure and timeframes set forth in Paragraph 6 whereby the
5
Producing Party is the “Challenging Party” and the Receiving Party is the “Designating Party”
6
for purposes of dispute resolution.
7
(e)
The Receiving Party shall maintain a record of any individual who has
8
inspected any portion of the source code in electronic or paper form, and maintain a record of the
9
existence of any electronic or paper copies of the code. The Receiving Party shall maintain all
10
paper copies of any printed portions of the source code in a secured area. Absent permission by
11
the Producing Party, the Receiving Party shall only make additional paper or electronic (.pdf)
12
copies if such additional copies are (1) necessary to prepare court filings, pleadings, or other
13
papers (including a testifying expert’s expert report), (2) necessary for deposition, or (3)
14
otherwise necessary for the preparation of its case. Additional paper or electronic copies are
15
prohibited. Any paper copies used during a deposition shall be retrieved by the Producing or
16
Receiving Party at the end of each day and must not be given to or left with a court reporter or
17
any other individual.
18
10.
19
LITIGATION.
20
PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER
If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that
21
compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “HIGHLY
22
CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” “HIGHLY
23
CONFIDENTIAL NON-TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY
24
CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” that Party must:
25
26
27
28
(a)
promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall
include a copy of the subpoena or court order;
(b)
promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to
issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is
-17STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated
2
Protective Order; and
3
4
(c)
cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued
by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.
5
If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the
6
subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as “HIGHLY
7
CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” “HIGHLY
8
CONFIDENTIAL NON-TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY
9
CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” before a determination by
10
the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating
11
Party’s permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking
12
protection in that court of its confidential material – and nothing in these provisions should be
13
construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful
14
directive from another court.
15
By entering this order and limiting the disclosure of information in this case, the
16
Court does not intend to preclude another court from finding that information may be relevant
17
and subject to disclosure in another case. Any person or party subject to this order who becomes
18
subject to a motion to disclose another Party's information designated “HIGHLY
19
CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” “HIGHLY
20
CONFIDENTIAL NON-TECHNICAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY
21
CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” pursuant to this order
22
shall promptly notify that party of the motion so that the party may have an opportunity to appear
23
and be heard on whether that information should be disclosed.
24
11.
25
LITIGATION
26
A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN THIS
(a)
The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-
27
Party in this action and designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL TECHNICAL –
28
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL NON-TECHNICAL –
-18STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE –
2
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” Such information produced by Non-Parties in connection with
3
this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these
4
provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections.
5
(b)
In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to
6
produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an
7
agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the
8
Party shall:
9
1. promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that
10
some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non-
11
Party;
12
2. promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated Protective
13
Order in this litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of
14
the information requested; and
15
3. make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party.
16
(c)
If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this court
17
within fourteen (14) days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving
18
Party may produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request.
19
If the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any
20
information in its possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the
21
Non-Party before a determination by the court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-
22
Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected
23
Material.
24
(d)
Notwithstanding any other provision in this Order, documents or other
25
information, including pleadings or discovery responses, that are produced by a Party in this
26
action, but that were originally produced or prepared by an opposing party or third party in
27
another litigation, and which are designated pursuant to a Protective Order or similar Order or
28
stipulated agreement in the prior action, must be treated in accordance with the confidentiality
-19STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
designations made by the party that originally produced or provided the materials. For example,
2
if a document was produced by a subpoenaed party as “Outside Counsel’s Eyes Only” in a prior
3
litigation, and that document is produced by a Party in this action that originally obtained the
4
document pursuant to the subpoena in the prior action, it must be treated as “Outside Counsel’s
5
Eyes Only” in this action
6
12.
7
UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected
8
Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective
9
Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the
10
unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the
11
Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were
12
made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the
13
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
14
13.
15
MATERIAL
16
INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED
Inadvertent production of information shall be handled as follows, but this is without
17
prejudice to the right of any party to apply to the Court for further protection or disclosure
18
relating to discovery:
19
(a)
Notice By Producing Party. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
20
26(b)(5), immediately upon receiving notice from the producing party that information subject to
21
the attorney-client privilege or work-product immunity has been inadvertently produced, the
22
receiving party shall not review, copy, or otherwise disseminate the documents or materials, nor
23
shall it disclose their substance. The receiving party shall return or destroy the documents or
24
materials and all copies within three (3) business days from receiving notice;
25
(b)
Discovery By Receiving Party. If the receiving party, without notice from the
26
producing party, determines that information subject to the attorney-client privilege or work-
27
product immunity has been inadvertently produced, the receiving party shall immediately contact
28
the producing party and advise them of the inadvertent disclosure. Pursuant to Federal Rules of
-20STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
Civil Procedure 26(b)(5), the receiving party shall not review, copy, or otherwise disseminate the
2
documents or materials, nor shall it disclose their substance. In addition, the receiving party
3
shall return or destroy the documents or materials and all copies within three (3) business days
4
from discovery of the inadvertent disclosure;
5
(c)
Challenges. If the receiving party believes that it has a good-faith basis for
6
challenging the privilege claim, the receiving party shall provide the producing party with a
7
written explanation of the good-faith basis for the belief that the inadvertently produced
8
documents or materials are not privileged within three (3) business days of the producing party's
9
request for return. The producing party shall respond in writing to the receiving party’s timely
10
challenge to the privilege or immunity claim within five (5) business days from receipt of the
11
challenge;
12
(d)
Motion To Compel. In the event the parties cannot agree as to the privilege or
13
immunity status of the inadvertently produced documents or materials, the receiving party shall
14
have five (5) business days from receipt of the producing party’s written response to the
15
privilege challenge to file a motion (in accordance with any applicable standing orders or local
16
rules) seeking an order compelling production of the inadvertently produced documents or
17
materials. The receiving party shall not use the substantive content of the inadvertently produced
18
documents or materials to challenge their status as privileged or immune, but may submit the
19
document under confidential seal for the Court's review. In the event that a motion is made, the
20
producing party shall have the burden of proving that the inadvertently produced documents or
21
materials are privileged or immune from discovery;
22
(e)
No Waiver - Order. Inadvertent disclosure of information subject to the attorney-
23
client privilege, work-product immunity, or any other applicable privilege or immunity shall not
24
constitute a waiver of such privilege(s). Pursuant to Rule 502(d) of the Federal Rules of
25
Evidence, the Court hereby orders that the attorney-client privilege or work product protection is
26
not waived by disclosure connected with the above-referenced matter and any such disclosure is
27
also not waived in any other Federal or State proceeding.
28
-21STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
2
14.
MISCELLANEOUS
14.1
Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to
3
seek further or additional protection of any Disclosure or Discovery Material or to seek its
4
modification by the court in the future.
5
14.2
Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective
6
Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any
7
information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly,
8
no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material
9
covered by this Protective Order.
10
14.3
Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party
11
or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in
12
the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any
13
Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62. Protected
14
Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the
15
specific Protected Material at issue. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62, a
16
sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing that the Protected Material at issue is
17
privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. If a
18
Receiving Party's request to file Protected Material under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-
19
5(d) and General Order 62 is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the Protected
20
Material in the public record pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) unless otherwise instructed by
21
the court.
22
14.4
No Restriction on Advising Client. Nothing in this Order shall be construed to
23
prevent Counsel from advising their respective clients regarding this case, even if Counsel must
24
rely on Protected Information in formulating such advice, as long as no Protected Information is
25
disclosed in violation of this Order.
26
14.5
Limitation on Discovery from Experts. Absent good cause, drafts of expert
27
reports and other expert work product is not discoverable. Additionally, communications
28
between an Expert and a Party's Counsel are not discoverable except as provided in Rule
-22STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
26(b)(4)(C) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Reports and materials exempt from
2
discovery under this section shall be treated as attorney work product for the purposes of this
3
case and Protective Order.
4
15.
5
FINAL DISPOSITION
Within sixty (60) days after the final disposition of this action, as defined in paragraph 4,
6
each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such
7
material, unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing Party. As used in this
8
subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, and
9
any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Whether the Protected
10
Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the
11
Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60-day
12
deadline that affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts,
13
compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected
14
Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all
15
pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda,
16
correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and
17
consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such
18
archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective
19
Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION). In addition, notwithstanding the preceding
20
section, Counsel are entitled to retain any copies that exist on backup tapes or other media used
21
for disaster recovery purposes, provided that such copies will not be accessed except upon notice
22
to the Producing Party.
23
24
25
26
27
28
-23STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
2
3
DATED: July 2, 2013
/s/ Terry W. Ahearn
4
Attorneys for Plaintiff
5
6
DATED: July 2, 2013
7
_
/s/ Toby Mock
Attorneys for Defendant
8
9
10
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that I have obtained the
11
concurrence in the filing of this document from all the signatories for whom a signature is
12
indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document and I have on file records
13
to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection
14
upon request.
15
16
Dated: July 2, 2013
/s/ Terry W. Ahearn
Terry W. Ahearn
17
S
ER
H
24
25
S . Ti ga r
R NIA
n
J u d ge J o
FO
RT
23
NO
22
LI
21
ERED
July 2, 2013
DATED: ________________________ _____________________________________
O ORD
IT IS S
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
A
20
RT
U
O
19
S DISTRICT
TE
C
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. TA
UNIT
ED
18
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
26
27
28
-24STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
1
EXHIBIT A
2
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
3
I, _____________________________, of _________________, declare under
4
penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order
5
that was issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on
6
_____ in the case of SAGE Electrochromics, Inc. v. View, Inc., Case No. 12-cv-06441-JST. I
7
agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I
8
understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and
9
punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner
10
any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity
11
except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order.
12
I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for
13
the Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated
14
Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.
15
I hereby appoint __________________________ of
16
_______________________________________ as my California agent for service of process in
17
connection with this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated
18
Protective Order.
19
20
Date: _________________________________
21
City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________
22
Printed name: ______________________________
23
24
25
[printed name]
Signature: __________________________________
[signature]
26
27
28
DM_US 42607120-8.092184.0011
-25STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-06441-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?