Ponting et al v. Lowe's HIW, Inc.

Filing 25

Disregard, see Dkt. No. 24. (whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2014) Modified on 2/7/2014 (whalc3, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MICHAEL PONTING and JUDY WONG, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 Plaintiffs, v. LOWE’S HIW, INC., 14 ORDER RE MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND COMPEL DISCOVERY Defendant. / 15 16 No. C 12-06442 WHA Defendant Lowe’s HIW, Inc., moves to continue the March 17 trial date and re-open 17 discovery due to alleged misconduct by plaintiff Michael Ponting and plaintiffs’ counsel. 18 Defendant claims that Ponting failed to disclose that he had tripped and was transported to the 19 emergency room at San Francisco General Hospital in August 2011. Moreover, defendant 20 argues that Ponting withheld important medical information from his expert witnesses and failed 21 to provide written disclosures for his non-retained expert witnesses, among other alleged 22 problems. 23 A hearing on all of these issues will be held on FEBRUARY 19, 2014, AT 8:00 A.M. 24 Plaintiffs must file a response to this motion by NOON ON FEBRUARY 13. Defendant must file a 25 reply by NOON ON FEBRUARY 17. At the hearing, both parties must be prepared to identify and 26 address all issues properly raised. The parties are further ordered to bring all necessary materials 27 to get to the bottom of defendant’s allegations of misconduct. In the meantime, the trial date 28 stands and the parties must file all pretrial materials on time. 1 Defendant must explain why it waited to depose Doreen Casuto, R.N., until after the 2 close of discovery. Defendant must also be prepared to identify all information it seeks to 3 supplement discovery and exactly how that information would be obtained. Plaintiff and 4 plaintiff’s counsel must address why they did not disclose the August 2011 fall. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: February 7, 2014. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?