Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation

Filing 121

STIPULATED ORDER TO EXTEND EMAIL DISCOVERY DEADLINE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 8, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 David T. Pritikin (Pro Hac Vice) dpritikin@sidley.com Sidley Austin LLP 1 South Dearborn Street Chicago, IL 60603 Telephone: (312) 853-7000 Facsimile: (312) 853-7036 Aseem S. Gupta (S.B. #252858) agupta@sidley.com M. Patricia Thayer (S.B. #90818) pthayer@sidley.com Philip W. Woo (S.B. #196459) pwoo@sidley.com Sidley Austin LLP 555 California Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 772-1200 Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 I. Neel Chatterjee (S.B. #173985) nchatterjee@orrick.com Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 614-7400 Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 William H. Wright (S.B. #161580) wwright@orrick.com Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 777 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3200 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 629-2020 Facsimile: (213) 612-2499 SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware Corporation 23 Plaintiff, 24 27 Attorneys for Defendant MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 22 26 Kristin L. Cleveland (S.B. #184639) kristin.cleveland@klarquist.com Salumeh R. Loesch (Pro Hac Vice) salumeh.loesch@klarquist.com Jeffrey S. Love (S.B. #195068) jeffrey.love@klarquist.com Andrew M. Mason (Pro Hac Vice) andrew.mason@klarquist.com John D. Vandenberg (Pro Hac Vice) john.vandenberg@klarquist.com Klarquist Sparkman, LLP 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, OR 97204 Telephone: (503) 595-5300 Facsimile: (503) 595-5301 Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNOPSYS, INC. 21 25 George A. Riley (S.B. #118304) griley@omm.com Mark E. Miller (S.B. #130200) markmiller@omm.com Luann L. Simmons (S.B. #203526) lsimmons@omm.com Michael Sapoznikow (S.B. #242640) msapoznikow@omm.com Elizabeth Offen-Brown (S.B. #279077) eoffenbrown@omm.com O’Melveny & Meyers LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 v. Case No. 3:12-cv-06467-MMC STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND EMAIL DISCOVERY DEADLINE MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION, an Oregon Corporation, Defendant. 28 STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EMAIL DISCOVERY DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC 1 2 3 4 The Court ORDERS as follows: 1. This Order supplements the Court’s December 20, 2013 Order governing the discovery of electronic mail. 2. This Order applies to this litigation. The parties have requested a similar order in 5 Mentor Graphics Corp. v. EVE-USA, Inc. et. al., Case Nos. 3:10-CV- 954-MO, 3:12-CV-1500- 6 MO, 3:13-CV-579-MO (D. Or.). 7 3. This Order may be modified for good cause. 8 4. On November 1, 2013, Parties filed a Stipulated Administrative Motion for Entry 9 10 11 12 13 of Order for Discovery of Email (Dkt. No. 89) and Proposed Order (Dkt. No. 89-1) in which the Parties agreed to complete rolling productions of email by December 20, 2013. 5. The Court entered the Proposed Order on November 6, 2013 (Dkt. No. 97), setting December 20, 2013 as the date by when the parties shall complete rolling productions of email. 6. On December 19, 2013, Parties filed a Stipulation Extend the Email Discovery 14 Deadline (Dkt. No. 116) and Proposed Order (Dkt. No. 116-1) in which the Parties agreed to 15 complete rolling productions of email by January 10, 2014. 16 17 7. The parties have agreed to and have shown good cause to extend the deadline to complete rolling productions of email from January 10, 2014 to January 17, 2014. 18 19 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 24 January 8, 2014 Dated:__________________________ _______________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EMAIL DISCOVERY DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?