Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation
Filing
121
STIPULATED ORDER TO EXTEND EMAIL DISCOVERY DEADLINE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 8, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
David T. Pritikin (Pro Hac Vice)
dpritikin@sidley.com
Sidley Austin LLP
1 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60603
Telephone:
(312) 853-7000
Facsimile:
(312) 853-7036
Aseem S. Gupta (S.B. #252858)
agupta@sidley.com
M. Patricia Thayer (S.B. #90818)
pthayer@sidley.com
Philip W. Woo (S.B. #196459)
pwoo@sidley.com
Sidley Austin LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
(415) 772-1200
Facsimile:
(415) 772-7400
I. Neel Chatterjee (S.B. #173985)
nchatterjee@orrick.com
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone:
(650) 614-7400
Facsimile:
(650) 614-7401
William H. Wright (S.B. #161580)
wwright@orrick.com
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
777 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3200
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone:
(213) 629-2020
Facsimile:
(213) 612-2499
SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware Corporation
23
Plaintiff,
24
27
Attorneys for Defendant
MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
22
26
Kristin L. Cleveland (S.B. #184639)
kristin.cleveland@klarquist.com
Salumeh R. Loesch (Pro Hac Vice)
salumeh.loesch@klarquist.com
Jeffrey S. Love (S.B. #195068)
jeffrey.love@klarquist.com
Andrew M. Mason (Pro Hac Vice)
andrew.mason@klarquist.com
John D. Vandenberg (Pro Hac Vice)
john.vandenberg@klarquist.com
Klarquist Sparkman, LLP
121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600
Portland, OR 97204
Telephone:
(503) 595-5300
Facsimile:
(503) 595-5301
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.
21
25
George A. Riley (S.B. #118304)
griley@omm.com
Mark E. Miller (S.B. #130200)
markmiller@omm.com
Luann L. Simmons (S.B. #203526)
lsimmons@omm.com
Michael Sapoznikow (S.B. #242640)
msapoznikow@omm.com
Elizabeth Offen-Brown (S.B. #279077)
eoffenbrown@omm.com
O’Melveny & Meyers LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
(415) 984-8700
Facsimile:
(415) 984-8701
v.
Case No. 3:12-cv-06467-MMC
STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND EMAIL DISCOVERY
DEADLINE
MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION, an
Oregon Corporation,
Defendant.
28
STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EMAIL DISCOVERY DEADLINES
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC
1
2
3
4
The Court ORDERS as follows:
1.
This Order supplements the Court’s December 20, 2013 Order governing the
discovery of electronic mail.
2.
This Order applies to this litigation. The parties have requested a similar order in
5
Mentor Graphics Corp. v. EVE-USA, Inc. et. al., Case Nos. 3:10-CV- 954-MO, 3:12-CV-1500-
6
MO, 3:13-CV-579-MO (D. Or.).
7
3.
This Order may be modified for good cause.
8
4.
On November 1, 2013, Parties filed a Stipulated Administrative Motion for Entry
9
10
11
12
13
of Order for Discovery of Email (Dkt. No. 89) and Proposed Order (Dkt. No. 89-1) in which the
Parties agreed to complete rolling productions of email by December 20, 2013.
5.
The Court entered the Proposed Order on November 6, 2013 (Dkt. No. 97), setting
December 20, 2013 as the date by when the parties shall complete rolling productions of email.
6.
On December 19, 2013, Parties filed a Stipulation Extend the Email Discovery
14
Deadline (Dkt. No. 116) and Proposed Order (Dkt. No. 116-1) in which the Parties agreed to
15
complete rolling productions of email by January 10, 2014.
16
17
7.
The parties have agreed to and have shown good cause to extend the deadline to
complete rolling productions of email from January 10, 2014 to January 17, 2014.
18
19
20
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
23
24
January 8, 2014
Dated:__________________________
_______________________________
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EMAIL DISCOVERY DEADLINES
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?