Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation

Filing 126

STIPULATED ORDER MODIFYING ORDER FOR DISCOVERY OF EMAIL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 23, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

David T. Pritikin (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60603
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

George A. Riley (SBN 118304)
[e-mail]
Mark E. Miller (SBN 130200)
[e-mail]
Luann L. Simmons (SBN 203526)
[e-mail]
Michael Sapoznikow (SBN 242640)
[e-mail]
Elizabeth Offen-Brown (SBN 279077)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

M. Patricia Thayer (SBN 90818)
[e-mail]
Philip W. Woo (SBN 196459)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Kristin L. Cleveland (SBN 184639)
[e-mail]
Stephen J. Joncus (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Jeffrey S. Love (SBN 195068)
[e-mail]
Andrew M. Mason (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
John D. Vandenberg (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Salumeh R. Loesch
[e-mail]
KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600
Portland, OR 97204
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

I. Neel Chatterjee (SBN 173985)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
William H. Wright (SBN 161580)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
777 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3200
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware Corporation

Attorneys for Defendant
MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION, an
Oregon Corporation

19
20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

21

NORTHERN DISTRICT CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

22
23

SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
Plaintiff,

24
25

vs.

26

MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION, an
Oregon Corporation,

27
28

Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:12-cv-06467-MMC
STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING ORDER FOR DISCOVERY
OF EMAIL (DKT. NO. 97)

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING ORDER FOR DISCOVERY OF EMAIL – CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC

1

The Court ORDERS as follows:
1.

2
3

(Dkt. No. 97) to add a third round of email discovery and to enlarge the email production limit.
2.

4
5

Paragraph 12 of the Order for Discovery of Email is modified so that the email

production limit is enlarged from 30,000 to 31,500 emails.
3.

6
7

This Order modifies the Order for Discovery of Email entered on November 6, 2013

Paragraph 13 of the Order for Discovery of Email is modified and supplemented as

follows:

8

13. The parties shall request emails in three rounds. The following schedule is

9

adopted.

10

*

*

*

*

11
c.

12

Round three: three custodians
Wednesday, January 22, 2014 at 4:00 p.m.: Parties exchange requests of

13
14

three custodians1 and ten search terms, as well as time frames for the emails to be

15

searched, if applicable.
Friday, January 24, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.: Parties meet and confer regarding

16

search terms, if necessary.

17

Friday, January 31, 2014: The producing party shall inform the requesting

18
19

party whether the number of documents returned by applying search terms for the

20

proposed custodians exceeds 1,500 individual emails and provide the results of the

21

searches. If the results exceed 1,500 individual emails, the requesting party shall,

22

within two (2) business days, (a) select a subset of search terms for production that

23

result in fewer than 1,500 individual emails and/or (b) modify the existing search

24

terms.
February 14, 2014: Parties complete production of third round of email

25

discovery.

26
27

1

The custodians identified in Round Three must be custodians previously identified by the parties in
Round One and/or Round Two.

28
1
STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING ORDER FOR DISCOVERY OF EMAIL – CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC

1
2

February 19, 2014: Parties exchange privilege logs for the third round of
email discovery.

3
4

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

23
Dated: January 22, 2014
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

STIPULATED [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING ORDER FOR DISCOVERY OF EMAIL – CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC