Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation

Filing 140

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 139 Stipulation.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2014)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-06467-MMC Document139 Filed02/27/14 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 David T. Pritikin (Pro Hac Vice) dpritikin@sidley.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1 South Dearborn Street Chicago, IL 60603 Telephone: (312) 853-7000 Facsimile: (312) 853-7036 George A. Riley (SBN 118304) griley@omm.com Mark E. Miller (SBN 130200) markmiller@omm.com Luann L. Simmons (SBN 203526) lsimmons@omm.com Michael Sapoznikow (SBN 242640) msapoznikow@omm.com Elizabeth Offen-Brown (SBN 279077) eoffenbrown@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 M. Patricia Thayer (SBN 90818) pthayer@sidley.com Philip W. Woo (SBN 196459) pwoo@sidley.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 California Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 772-1200 Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 Kristin L. Cleveland (SBN 184639) kristin.cleveland@klarquist.com Salumeh R. Loesch (Pro Hac Vice) salumeh.loesch@klarquist.com Jeffrey S. Love (SBN 195068) jeffrey.love@klarquist.com Andrew M. Mason (Pro Hac Vice) andrew.mason@klarquist.com John D. Vandenberg (Pro Hac Vice) john.vandenberg@klarquist.com KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, OR 97204 Telephone: (503) 595-5300 Facsimile: (503) 595-5301 I. Neel Chatterjee (SBN 173985) nchatterjee@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 614-7400 Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNOPSYS, INC. 15 16 Attorneys for Defendant MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION 17 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 NORTHERN DISTRICT CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 21 SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff, vs. MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION, an Oregon Corporation, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:12-cv-06467-MMC (DMR) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO SUBMIT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER OR JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER (D.I. 128) 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO SUBMIT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER OR JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER (D.I. 128) – CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC Case3:12-cv-06467-MMC Document139 Filed02/27/14 Page2 of 3 1 2 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) and Defendant Mentor Graphics Corp. (“Mentor Graphics”) as follows: 3 WHEREAS, the Court, in its January 29, 2014 Order Re: Joint Discovery Letter [Docket 4 No. 113], ordered the parties to meet and confer and submit a stipulated protective order or a joint 5 discovery letter on the remaining disputes by February 28, 2014. D.I. 128. 6 7 WHEREAS, the Parties have been meeting and conferring on a stipulated protective order and have made significant progress in reaching agreement on most aspects of a protective order; 8 9 WHEREAS, the Parties are continuing to meet and confer to iron out the specific details of a prosecution bar that will address both Parties’ needs and concerns; and 10 WHEREAS the Parties’ proposed extension will not affect the schedule for the case; 11 NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties hereby stipulate to 12 extend the deadline to file a stipulated protective order or joint discovery letter on remaining 13 protective order disputes to March 7, 2014. 14 Respectfully submitted, 15 16 By: /s/Philip W. Woo Philip W. Woo Dated: February 27, 2014 17 Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNOPSYS, INC. 18 19 20 Dated: February 27, 2014 By: /s/ Salumeh R. Loesch Salumeh R. Loesch 21 Attorneys for Defendant MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION 22 23 24 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO SUBMIT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER OR JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER (D.I. 128) – CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC Case3:12-cv-06467-MMC Document139 Filed02/27/14 Page3 of 3 1 2 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), counsel for Synopsys has obtained the concurrence of Defendant’s counsel in the filing of this stipulation. 3 4 Dated: February 27, 2014 By: /s/Philip W. Woo Philip W. Woo 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware Corporation 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO SUBMIT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER OR JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER (D.I. 128) – CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?