Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation

Filing 178

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 177 Stipulation.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2014)

Case3:12-cv-06467-MMC Document177-1 Filed06/25/14 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4

David T. Pritikin (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60603
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

George A. Riley (SBN 118304)
[e-mail]
Mark E. Miller (SBN 130200)
[e-mail]
Luann L. Simmons (SBN 203526)
[e-mail]
Michael Sapoznikow (SBN #242640)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

M. Patricia Thayer (SBN 90818)
[e-mail]
Philip W. Woo (SBN 196459)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
I. Neel Chatterjee (SBN 173985)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

16
17
18
19

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware Corporation

Kristin L. Cleveland (SBN #184639)
[e-mail]
Salumeh R. Loesch (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Jeffrey S. Love (S.B. #195068)
[e-mail]
Andrew W. Mason (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
John D. Vandenberg (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600
Portland, OR 97204
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
Mentor Graphics Corporation, an Oregon
Corporation

20
21

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

22

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

23

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO AMEND CONTENTIONS
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC

Case3:12-cv-06467-MMC Document177-1 Filed06/25/14 Page2 of 2

1

SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

Plaintiff,

2
3
4

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

vs.
MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION, an
Oregon Corporation,

5

Defendant.

6

Case No. 3:12-cv-06467-MMC-(DMR)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
LEAVE TO AMEND
INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS AND
INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS

The Court ORDERS as follows:
7
1.

Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) and Defendant Mentor Graphics Corporation

8
(“Mentor Graphics”) jointly moved the Court seeking leave:
9
a. for Mentor Graphics to serve amended invalidity contentions, as reflected in an
10
email and attachments sent from Mentor Graphics counsel to Synopsys counsel on
11
May 30, 2014, and
12
b. for Synopsys to serve amended infringement contentions, as reflected in an email
13
and attachments sent from Synopsys counsel to Mentor Graphics counsel on June
14
18, 2014.
15
2.

Neither party opposes the other’s proposed amendments.

3.

The proposed amendments will narrow the issues in the case.

4.

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12 and Patent L.R. 3-6, the Parties’ Joint Stipulated Motion

16
17
18
is GRANTED: the parties may serve the amended contentions as described in the above-indicated
19
emails.

ER

27
28

A

H

26

R NIA

. Ryu

FO

RT

25

a
Honorable Donna M Ryu
e Donn M.
JudgStates Magistrate Judge
United

DERED

June 26, 2014

Dated: ___________________
24

O OR
IT IS S

LI

23

UNIT
ED

IT IS SO ORDERED.
22

NO

21

RT
U
O

S

20

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO AMEND CONTENTIONS
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC