Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation

Filing 185

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 183 Stipulation.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2014)

Case3:12-cv-06467-MMC Document183 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

David T. Pritikin (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60603
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

George A. Riley (SBN 118304)
[e-mail]
Mark E. Miller (SBN 130200)
[e-mail]
Luann L. Simmons (SBN 203526)
[e-mail]
Michael Sapoznikow (SBN 242640)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

M. Patricia Thayer (SBN 90818)
[e-mail]
Philip W. Woo (SBN 196459)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Kristin L. Cleveland (SBN 184639)
[e-mail]
Salumeh R. Loesch (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Jeffrey S. Love (SBN 195068)
[e-mail]
Andrew M. Mason (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
John D. Vandenberg (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600
Portland, OR 97204
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

I. Neel Chatterjee (SBN 173985)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.

15

Attorneys for Defendant
MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION

16
17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

20

SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

21
22
23
24
25

Plaintiff,
vs.
MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION, an
Oregon Corporation,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:12-cv-06467-MMC (DMR)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING SOURCE CODE
PRODUCED BY MENTOR GRAPHICS
CORPORATION

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SOURCE CODE PRODUCED BY MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION –
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC

Case3:12-cv-06467-MMC Document183 Filed07/01/14 Page2 of 3

1

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) and Defendant Mentor Graphics

2

Corporation (“Mentor Graphics”) are presently engaged in pretrial discovery, including discovery

3

regarding source code for the accused Mentor Graphics Veloce and Precision products;

4

WHEREAS, pursuant to an agreement between the parties, Mentor created a “cheat sheet”

5

containing information for representative Veloce or Precision products dating from December 21,

6

2006, to June 6, 2013, which was served on Synopsys as Exhibit A to Mentor’s Second

7

Supplemental Response to Synopsys Interrogatory No. 9;

8

WHEREAS, for each such representative Veloce or Precision product, the “cheat sheet”

9

identifies the product name, the release number, the approximate release date, and a source code

10

repository “tag” for a representative version of RTLC source code corresponding to such release;

11

IT IS, THEREFORE, AGREED AND STIPULATED, AS FOLLOWS:

12

1.

Mentor Graphics will not argue that any differences between the representative

13

RTLC identified for a particular release of a Precision or Veloce product and other versions of

14

RTLC are material to Synopsys’ analyses for infringement by the accused products, and

15

2.

Mentor Graphics will not argue that any differences between (a) the releases of a

16

Veloce or Precision product identified in the “cheat sheet,” and (b) releases of a Veloce or

17

Precision product not identified in the “cheat sheet,” are material to Synopsys’ analyses for

18

infringement by the accused products.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SOURCE CODE PRODUCED BY MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION –
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC

Case3:12-cv-06467-MMC Document183 Filed07/01/14 Page3 of 3

1

Respectfully submitted,

2
3

Dated: July 1, 2014

By: /s/ Philip W. Woo
Philip W. Woo

4

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.

5
6
7

Dated: July 1, 2014

By: /s/ Andy Mason
Andy Mason

8

Attorneys for Defendant
MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION

9
10
11

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13

Dated:

July 2, 2014

DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge

14
15

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), counsel for Synopsys has obtained the concurrence of

16

Defendant’s counsel in the filing of this stipulation.

17
18

Dated: July 1, 2014

By: /s/ Philip W. Woo
Philip W. Woo

19

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware Corporation

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SOURCE CODE PRODUCED BY MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION –
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC