Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation

Filing 207

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE CLOSE OF FACT DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 21, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

David T. Pritikin (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Sidley Austin LLP
1 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60603
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Aseem S. Gupta (S.B. # 252858)
[e-mail]
M. Patricia Thayer (S.B. #90818)
[e-mail]
Philip W. Woo (S.B. #196459)
[e-mail]
Sidley Austin LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
I. Neel Chatterjee (S.B. #173985)
[e-mail]
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
William H. Wright (S.B. #161580)
[e-mail]
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
777 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3200
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.

19

George A. Riley (S.B. #118304)
[e-mail]
Mark E. Miller (S.B. #130200)
[e-mail]
Luann L. Simmons (S.B. #203526)
[e-mail]
Michael Sapoznikow (S.B. #242640)
[e-mail]
O’Melveny & Myers LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Xavier A. Clark (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Kristin L. Cleveland (S.B. #184639)
[e-mail]
Salumeh R. Loesch (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Jeffrey S. Love (S.B. #195068)
[e-mail]
Andrew M. Mason (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
John D. Vandenberg (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Philip J. Warrick (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Owen D. Yeates (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Klarquist Sparkman, LLP
121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600
Portland, OR 97204
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION

20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

21

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
22
23
24

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware
Corporation
Plaintiff,

25
v.
26
27
28

Case No. 3:12-cv-06467-MMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS
AFTER THE CLOSE OF FACT
DISCOVERY

MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION,
an Oregon Corporation,
Defendant.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO TAKE
DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE CLOSE OF FACT DISCOVERY
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC

1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.
2
(“Synopsys”) and Defendant Mentor Graphics Corp. (“Mentor Graphics”) as follows:
3
WHEREAS, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 29 provides that the Parties may
4
stipulate to extend discovery;
5
WHEREAS, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 29(b) provides that Court
6
approval is required to extend discovery, even where the Parties have stipulated to
7
the extension;
8
WHEREAS, fact discovery in this case closes on July 18, 2014 (Dkt. No. 145);
9
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to take the deposition of certain identified
10
witnesses after the close of fact discovery due to witness availability and/or attorney
11
availability;
12
WHEREAS, good cause exists for allowing the Parties to take the desired
13
depositions;
14
IT IS, THEREFORE, AGREED AND STIPULATED, AS FOLLOWS:
15
1.

Parties have agreed to the below schedule to depose the listed witnesses

16
after the close of fact discovery:
17
18

Deponent

Deposition Date

19

Thomas Delaye

July 22, 2014

20

Bob Erickson

July 22, 2014

21

Meera Srinivasan

July 24, 2014

Brent Gregory, Rule 30(b)(6)
Topics 5, 11(b), 46, 47, and
50

July 25, 20141

22
23

Praveen Devulapalli

July 31, 2014

24

Angela Sutton

July 31, 2014

25

Aart de Geus

August 5, 20142

26
27
28

1

The Parties have agreed that this deposition will be limited to two hours on the
record.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO TAKE
DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE CLOSE OF FACT DISCOVERY
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC

1

1
The last fact deposition currently scheduled will occur on August 5, 2014.
2
2.

The Parties have agreed that the witnesses disclosed in the Parties’

3
Initial Disclosures for the first time on or after July 10, 2014 will be made available
4
for deposition after the close of fact discovery, provided the request for deposition is
5
made before the close of fact discovery.
6
3.

The Parties have agreed that any motions to compel relating to any

7
deposition in the above table shall be due one week (seven calendar days) following
8
the deposition. (See L.R. 37-3.)
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
10
Dated: July 18, 2014
11
12

By: /s/ Salumeh R. Loesch
Salumeh R. Loesch
Attorneys for Defendant
MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION

13
14
15

Dated: July 18, 2014

16

By: /s/ Philip W. Woo
Philip W. Woo
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.

17
18
19
20

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that

21

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other

22

signatory above.

23
24
Dated: July 18 2014
25

By: /s/ Salumeh R. Loesch
Salumeh R. Loesch

26
27
28

2 The Parties have agreed that this deposition will be limited to two hours on the
record.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO TAKE
DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE CLOSE OF FACT DISCOVERY
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC

2

1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
5

DATED:

July 21, 2014
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO TAKE
DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE CLOSE OF FACT DISCOVERY
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC

3