Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation

Filing 231

THIRD STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 7, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

David T. Pritikin (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Sidley Austin LLP
1 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60603
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Aseem S. Gupta (S.B. # 252858)
[e-mail]
M. Patricia Thayer (S.B. #90818)
[e-mail]
Philip W. Woo (S.B. #196459)
[e-mail]
Sidley Austin LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
I. Neel Chatterjee (S.B. #173985)
[e-mail]
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.

16
17
18

Attorneys for Defendant
MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION

19
20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

21

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

George A. Riley (S.B. #118304)
[e-mail]
Mark E. Miller (S.B. #130200)
[e-mail]
Luann L. Simmons (S.B. #203526)
[e-mail]
Michael Sapoznikow (S.B. #242640)
[e-mail]
O’Melveny & Myers LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Xavier A. Clark (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Kristin L. Cleveland (S.B. #184639)
[e-mail]
Salumeh R. Loesch (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Jeffrey S. Love (S.B. #195068)
[e-mail]
Andrew M. Mason (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
John D. Vandenberg (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Philip J. Warrick (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Owen D. Yeates (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Klarquist Sparkman, LLP
121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600
Portland, OR 97204
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware
Corporation
Plaintiff,
v.
MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION,
an Oregon Corporation,

Case No. 3:12-cv-06467-MMC
THIRD STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE
MOTION TO COMPEL
DISCOVERY

Defendant.
THIRD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
THE DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.
(“Synopsys”) and Defendant Mentor Graphics Corp. (“Mentor Graphics”) as follows:
WHEREAS, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 29 provides that the Parties may
stipulate to extend discovery;
WHEREAS, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 29(b) provides that Court
approval is required to extend discovery, even where the Parties have stipulated to
the extension;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Magistrate Judge Ryu’s Order of August 1, 2014, if
the parties are unable to resolve the seven discovery disputes of Dkt. 219 without
judicial intervention by the August 5, 2014 deadline, all such disputes shall be filed
as a single joint discovery letter of no more than 15 pages;
WHEREAS, the Parties still are continuing to discuss Mentor’s challenges to
certain of Synopsys’ documents designated “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
Only,” detailed in counsel for Mentor’s July 15, 2014 letter to counsel for Synopsys
and the dispute will be narrowed through further supplementation and/or
cooperation;
WHEREAS, the deadline for filing a letter brief on designation challenges
pursuant to § 7.3 of the Stipulated Protective Order at Dkt. 146 is five business days
after the parties’ meet and confer session;
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the Parties hereby
stipulate to extend the deadline on which to file the letter brief as to Mentor’s
challenges to certain of Synopsys’ documents designated “Highly Confidential –
Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” detailed in counsel for Mentor’s July 15, 2014 letter to
counsel for Synopsys, to August 7, 2014.

25
26
27
28

THIRD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
THE DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC

1

1
2

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: August 5, 2014

3

By: /s/ Salumeh R. Loesch
Salumeh R. Loesch
Attorneys for Defendant
MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION

4
5
6

Dated: August 5, 2014

7

By: /s/ Philip W. Woo
Philip W. Woo
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC.

8
9
10
11

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that

12

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other

13

signatory above.

14
15
16

Dated: August 5, 2014

By: /s/ Philip W. Woo
Philip W. Woo

17
18

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20
21
22

DATED:

August 7, 2014

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28

THIRD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
THE DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC

2