Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation

Filing 353

ORDER GRANTING SYNOPSYS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FROM VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER STRIKING MOTIONS All text contained in Mentor's Reply In Support of Its Daubert Motion To Exclude Certain Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert Mary Woodford (Dkt. No. 340-4) at 11:21-15:19 is stricken. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 31, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2014)

Case3:12-cv-06467-MMC Document345-2 Filed10/28/14 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

David T. Pritikin (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60603
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
M. Patricia Thayer (SBN 90818)
[e-mail]
Philip W. Woo (SBN 196459)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
I. Neel Chatterjee (SBN 173985)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware Corporation

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT CALIFORNIA

18

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

19
20

SYNOPSYS, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
Plaintiff,

21
22

vs.

23

MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION, an
Oregon Corporation,

24
25

Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:12-cv-06467-MMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SYNOPSYS' MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FROM
VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER
STRIKING MOTIONS

26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC

Case3:12-cv-06467-MMC Document345-2 Filed10/28/14 Page2 of 2

1

Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. ("Synopsys") filed a Motion For Administrative Relief From

2

Violation of Court Order Striking Motions ("Motion") on October 28, 2014. After fully considering

3

the Motion and the supporting documents concurrently therewith, Mentor Graphics Corporation's

4

opposition thereto, and all other documents submitted by the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

5

that all text contained in Mentor's Reply In Support of Its Daubert Motion To Exclude Certain

6

Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert Mary Woodford ("Woodford Motion") (Dkt. No. 340-4) at 11:21-

7

15:19, and all text in any of Mentor's other briefs that refers to the Woodford Motion at 11:21-15:19

8

or to the portion of Mentor's Motion to Strike and Exclude Certain Opinions Given in the Reports of

9

Ronald D. (Shawn) Blanton, Ph.D. (Dkt. No. 289-3) that was previously stricken by the Court's

10

is
Order Granting In Part Plaintiff's Motion For Expedited Administrative Relief (Dkt. No. 303) are ^

11

STRICKEN.

12
13

Dated: October 31, 2014

14
15

Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-06467-MMC