Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation
Filing
472
ORDER ON ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND EXHIBITS THERETO The motion is granted to the extent it seeks to seal portions of Exhibit F, and the requested portions of said exhibit may remain under seal. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 26, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2015)
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
SYNOPSYS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
For the Northern District of California
ORDER ON ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO SEAL DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
ATTORNEY FEES AND EXHIBITS
THERETO
v.
MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION,
Defendant.
9
United States District Court
No. C 12-6467 MMC
/
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Before the Court is defendant Mentor Graphics Corporation’s (“Mentor”)
“Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Motion for Attorney Fees,” filed May 4, 2015,
pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, by which Mentor seeks to file under seal, inter alia,
certain exhibits submitted in support of its motion for attorney fees, which documents have
been designated confidential by plaintiff Synopsys Inc. (“Synopsys”). By order filed May
13, 2015, the Court deferred ruling on the administrative motion to the extent it sought to
seal the entirety of Exhibit F to the declaration of Salumeh Loesch, pending Synopsys’ filing
a supplemental response providing for such document a redacted version limiting the
amount of material sought to be sealed. On May 22, 2015, Synopsys filed its supplemental
response. Having read and considered the supplemental response, the Court finds good
cause for the relief requested therein.
Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS the administrative motion to the extent it
seeks to seal portions of Exhibit F, and the requested portions of said exhibit may remain
under seal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: May 26, 2015
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?