Kumar et al v. Mayorkas

Filing 8

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 6 Stipulation (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2013)

Download PDF
1 4 JONATHAN M. KAUFMAN, ESQ. (California State Bar No. 104576) The Law Offices Of Jonathan M. Kaufman 220 Montgomery Street, Suite 689 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 956-4765 Facsimile: (415) 956-1664 E-Mail: jonathan-kaufman@sbcglobal.net 5 Attorney for Plaintiffs 2 3 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 9 PARDEEP KUMAR, et al., Case No. C 12-6470 MEJ 10 STIPULATION CONTINUING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESP OND T O DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR ORDER CHANGING VENUE Plaintiffs, 11 vs. 12 ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, 13 14 Date: June 6, 2013 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom B, 15th Floor Defendants. ___________________________________/ 15 16 This immigration case seeks review of the adjudication of Plaintiffs’ asylum petition by the 17 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. The agency has taken action on the petition and there 18 is the possibility that the matter may be resolved administratively. 19 The parties, by and through their respective counsel hereby stipulate, subject to approval of 20 the Court, that the time for Plaintiffs to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the 21 Alternative for Order Changing Venue is extended to May 16, 2013. 22 Dated: February 27, 2013 s/s Jonathan M. Kaufman ____________________________ JONATHAN M. KAUFMAN Attorney for Plaintiffs Dated: February 27, 2013 s/s Abraham A. Simmons _____________________________ ABRAHAM A. SIMMONS Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 1 2 ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 5 Dated: March 1, 2013 _________________________________________ Maria-Elena James United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?