Kumar et al v. Mayorkas
Filing
8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 6 Stipulation (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2013)
1
4
JONATHAN M. KAUFMAN, ESQ. (California State Bar No. 104576)
The Law Offices Of Jonathan M. Kaufman
220 Montgomery Street, Suite 689
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 956-4765
Facsimile: (415) 956-1664
E-Mail:
jonathan-kaufman@sbcglobal.net
5
Attorney for Plaintiffs
2
3
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
9
PARDEEP KUMAR, et al.,
Case No. C 12-6470 MEJ
10
STIPULATION CONTINUING TIME FOR
PLAINTIFFS TO RESP OND T O
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR ORDER
CHANGING VENUE
Plaintiffs,
11
vs.
12
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS,
13
14
Date: June 6, 2013
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Place: Courtroom B, 15th Floor
Defendants.
___________________________________/
15
16
This immigration case seeks review of the adjudication of Plaintiffs’ asylum petition by the
17
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. The agency has taken action on the petition and there
18
is the possibility that the matter may be resolved administratively.
19
The parties, by and through their respective counsel hereby stipulate, subject to approval of
20
the Court, that the time for Plaintiffs to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the
21
Alternative for Order Changing Venue is extended to May 16, 2013.
22
Dated: February 27, 2013
s/s Jonathan M. Kaufman
____________________________
JONATHAN M. KAUFMAN
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Dated: February 27, 2013
s/s Abraham A. Simmons
_____________________________
ABRAHAM A. SIMMONS
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorney for Defendant
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
1
2
ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
Dated: March 1, 2013
_________________________________________
Maria-Elena James
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?