Funes v. Instagram, Inc et al
Filing
39
ORDER RE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT re 38 MOTION to Amend/Correct for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Lucy Rodrigues (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
12
13
14
No. C 12-06482 WHA
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
LUCY RODRIGUEZ, individually, and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
v.
ORDER RE MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED
COMPLAINT
INSTAGRAM, LLC,
Defendant.
/
15
16
Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. The proposed
17
amended complaint seeks relief on behalf of a nationwide class, rather than the California class
18
originally sought in the first amended complaint.
19
Defendant is requested to file a response to the motion, due by JUNE 24 AT NOON. In
20
particular, the Court is interested in whether plaintiff’s proposed amendment is contrary to the
21
factors identified in Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962); the extent to which an
22
amendment made for the sole purpose of pleading federal subject-matter jurisdiction may be
23
denied; and whether California’s Unfair Competition Law can be applied extraterritorially to
24
plaintiffs who are not California residents. Plaintiff may file a reply, due by JUNE 28 AT NOON.
25
26
27
28
Dated: June 14, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?