Castillo v. Elmwood Mens Correctional Facility et al

Filing 7

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/3/13. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2013)

1
2

*E-Filed 6/3/13*

3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

CHRISTOPHER JAMES CASTILLO,

11
12

No. C 12-6511 RS (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff,
v.

13

ELMSWOOD CORRECTIONAL
14 FACILITY, et al.,
Defendants.

15

/

16
17

Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint by the Court’s deadline.

18

Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failing to respond to the

19

Court’s order, and for failure to prosecute, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Because this dismissal

20

is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen the action. Any such motion must contain

21

an amended complaint that addresses the concerns raised in the order dismissing the

22

complaint with leave to amend. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendants, and

23

close the file.

24
25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 3, 2013
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge

27
28
No. C 12-6511 RS (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL