Mardjuki et al v. New York Community Bank et al
Filing
9
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST 7 TO APPEAR BY PHONE, filed by NYCB Mortgage Company, LLC, New York Community Bank. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 02/05/2013. (nclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2013)
1 HAHN LOESER & PARKS LLP
2 Scott J. Kelly, SBN 210747
skelly@hahnlaw.com
3 James E. Heffner, SBN 245406
4 jheffner@hahnlaw.com
One America Plaza
5 600 West Broadway, Suite 1500
San Diego, California 92101
6 Telephone: (619) 810-4300
Fax: (619) 810-4301
7
8 Attorneys for Defendants New York
Community Bank and NYCB Mortgage
9 Company, LLC
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 ROBERT K. MARDJUKI, an individual, and
SUSANNA MARDJUKI, an individual,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
vs.
15
NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANK, an
16 unknown entity, U.S. BANK, TRUSTEE OF
THE STRUCTURED ADJUSTABLE RATE
17 MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, MORTGAGE
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES
18 2006-7, NYCB MORTGAGE COMPANY,
LLC, a limited liability company, and DOES 119 50 inclusive,
20
Defendants.
Case No.: C-12-06561 NC
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC
APPEARANCE
Date: February 13, 2013
Time: 1:00 p.m.
Location: San Francisco Division
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, California 94102
Courtroom: A, 15th Floor
Judge: Magistrate Nathanael M. Cousins
Complaint Filed: Removed December 28, 2012
Trial Date: Not yet assigned
21
IT IS SO ORDERED that Scott J. Kelly may appear telephonically at the hearing on New
York Community Bank and NYCB Mortgage Company, LLC’s Motion C Dismiss, which is
S DISTRIto
R NIA
S
RT
28
Hon. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins
United States District Court Cousins
. Judge
NO
27
NTED
GRA
______________________________
Judge Na
thanael M
H
3
ER
Request to Appear by Phone at Motion to Dismiss Hearing
N
FO
26
Dated: _____________, 2013
February 5
UNIT
ED
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
TC
RT
U
O
scheduled for February 13, 2013 at 1:00 p.m.
24
E
AT
T
LI
23
A
22
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?