Mardjuki et al v. New York Community Bank et al

Filing 9

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST 7 TO APPEAR BY PHONE, filed by NYCB Mortgage Company, LLC, New York Community Bank. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 02/05/2013. (nclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2013)

Download PDF
1 HAHN LOESER & PARKS LLP 2 Scott J. Kelly, SBN 210747 3 James E. Heffner, SBN 245406 4 One America Plaza 5 600 West Broadway, Suite 1500 San Diego, California 92101 6 Telephone: (619) 810-4300 Fax: (619) 810-4301 7 8 Attorneys for Defendants New York Community Bank and NYCB Mortgage 9 Company, LLC 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 ROBERT K. MARDJUKI, an individual, and SUSANNA MARDJUKI, an individual, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 vs. 15 NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANK, an 16 unknown entity, U.S. BANK, TRUSTEE OF THE STRUCTURED ADJUSTABLE RATE 17 MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 18 2006-7, NYCB MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLC, a limited liability company, and DOES 119 50 inclusive, 20 Defendants. Case No.: C-12-06561 NC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE Date: February 13, 2013 Time: 1:00 p.m. Location: San Francisco Division 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102 Courtroom: A, 15th Floor Judge: Magistrate Nathanael M. Cousins Complaint Filed: Removed December 28, 2012 Trial Date: Not yet assigned 21 IT IS SO ORDERED that Scott J. Kelly may appear telephonically at the hearing on New York Community Bank and NYCB Mortgage Company, LLC’s Motion C Dismiss, which is S DISTRIto R NIA S RT 28 Hon. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins United States District Court Cousins . Judge NO 27 NTED GRA ______________________________ Judge Na thanael M H 3 ER Request to Appear by Phone at Motion to Dismiss Hearing N FO 26 Dated: _____________, 2013 February 5 UNIT ED IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 TC RT U O scheduled for February 13, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. 24 E AT T LI 23 A 22 F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?