Singh v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 56

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES 37 to renewal after decision by the Ninth Circuit. (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/17/2014) Modified on 1/21/2014 (ysS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15

No. C 12-06566 SI

JAMES SINGH,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE MOTION FOR
ATTORNEYS’ FEES

Plaintiff,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.

/

16
17

This action has been stayed pending resolution of plaintiff’s appeal by the Ninth Circuit.

18

Accordingly, defendants’ motion for attorneys fees (Docket No. 37) is DENIED WITHOUT

19

PREJUDICE to renewal after decision by the Ninth Circuit.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 17. 2014
_____________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge