Gizzarelli v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 6

ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Preliminary Injunction Hearing set for 1/11/2013 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/31/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/31/2012)

Download PDF
2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 1 DAVID GIZARELLI, Guardian of Charlie, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 No. 12-06568 CRB ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL, et al., 16 17 Defendants. ____________________________________/ 18 19 Plaintiff has made the requisite showing of irreparable harm, serious questions going to 20 the merits, and the balance of hardship tipping sharply in the moving party’s favor to warrant the 21 issuance of a temporary restraining order. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 22 1131 (9th Cir. 2011). Defendants are hereby enjoined and restrained from euthanizing a dog 23 identified as “Charlie,” in the Application for Temporary Restraining Order pending a hearing on 24 a preliminary injunction before the Honorable Charles R. Breyer, which shall be held on Friday, 25 January 11, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor of the Court. Plaintiff shall post a 26 bond in the amount of $500.00 by Friday, January 4, 2013. Defendants may file an opposition to 27 plaintiff’s motion no later than Monday, January 8 at 5:00 p.m. Any reply by plaintiff shall be 28 NO. CV 12-06568 CRB ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS due no later than Wednesday, January 10, at 5:00 p.m. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 Dated: 12/31/12 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NO. CV 12-06568 CRB ORDER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?