Integral Development Corp v. Tolat

Filing 61

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO LODGE WITH CHAMBERS NEW, UNREDACTED VERSIONS OF THE PARTIES' JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEFS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 4/15/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

Northern District of California

10

San Francisco Division
INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT CORP,

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

Plaintiff,
v.

13
VIRAL TOLAT,
14
15

Defendant.
_____________________________________/

No. C 12-06575 JSW (LB)
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
LODGE WITH CHAMBERS NEW,
UNREDACTED VERSIONS OF THE
PARTIES’ JOINT DISCOVERY
LETTER BRIEFS AND RELATED
DOCUMENTS

16

On January 10, 2013, Judge White referred all discovery disputes in this action to a magistrate

17

judge for resolution. Order of Referral, ECF No. 45. The next day, the action was assigned to the

18

undersigned. Docket Entry Dated January 11, 2013.

19

On April 11, 2013, the parties filed redacted versions of two joint discovery letters briefs

20

describing two discovery disputes. Joint Discovery Letter Brief No. 1, ECF No. 55; Joint Discovery

21

Letter Brief No. 2, ECF No. 56. Plaintiff also filed redacted versions of two declarations in support

22

of its positions in these two joint discovery letter briefs. Sandhu Declaration, ECF No. 57; Berryhill

23

Declaration, ECF No. 58. Thereafter, Plaintiff filed two administrative motions requesting

24

permission to file portions of the two joint discovery letter briefs and the Sandhu and Berryhill

25

Declarations under seal. First Administrative Motion, ECF No. 59; Second Administrative Motion,

26

ECF No. 60.

27
28

On April 15, 2013, the undersigned’s chambers received unredacted copies of the two joint
discovery letter briefs and the Sandhu and Berryhill Declarations. These unredacted copies,

C 12-06575 JSW (LB)
ORDER

1

however, do not highlight the portions of the letters and declarations that Plaintiff seeks to file under

2

seal. To be sure, the undersigned could compare, page by page and line by line, the redacted

3

versions with the unredacted versions to determine which portions Plaintiff seeks to file under seal,

4

but the undersigned believes this is a job more appropriately suited for counsel. Accordingly, no

5

later than April 18, 2013, Plaintiff is directed to submit new, unredacted versions of the two joint

6

discovery letter briefs and the Sandhu and Berryhill Declarations with the portions that Plaintiff

7

seeks to file under seal highlighted in yellow.

8
9
10

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

In addition, the new copies that Plaintiff provides should be “three-hole-punched, two-sided
cop[ies] unless another format makes more sense (e.g., for spreadsheets, pictures, or exhibits)” as
required by the undersigned’s standing order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 15, 2013
_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

C 12-06575 JSW (LB)
ORDER

2