Integral Development Corp v. Tolat
Filing
78
ORDER GRANTING 77 STIPULATION to Continue Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 5/17/2013. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/24/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/8/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
JACK RUSSO (State Bar No. 96068)
CHRISTOPHER SARGENT (State Bar No. 246285)
COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP
401 Florence Street
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (650) 327-9800
Facsimile: (650) 618-1863
E-mail: jrusso@computerlaw.com
csargent@computerlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT CORP.
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT CORP, a California Case No.: 3:12-cv-06575-JSW (LB)
corporation,
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE
Plaintiff,
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
v.
VIRAL TOLAT, an individual, and DOES 1-20,
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Computerlaw
Group LLP
computerlaw.com
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
Case No. 3:12-cv-06575-JSW
JOINT STIPULATION
1
2
WHEREAS, on January 4, 2013, the Court issued an Order Setting Case Management
3
Conference and Requiring Joint Case Management Conference Statement (Dkt. 17), setting the Case
4
Management Conference for April 19, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. in Department 11;
5
6
7
WHEREAS, on April 1, 2013, the parties files a Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
Continuing the Case Management Conference (Dkt. 53); on April 2, 2013, granted the Joint Stipulation
and Order Continuing the Case Management Conference (Dkt. 54) continuing the Case Management
Conference to June 14, 2013;
8
9
WHEREAS, on April 19, 2013, Plaintiff filed an Administrative Motion for Early Telephonic
Case Management Conference (Dkt. 63); on May 2, 2013, the Court issued an order granting
10
Plaintiff’s Administrative Motion for Early Telephonic Case Management Conference (Dkt. 71) setting
11
the Case Management Conference to May 10, 2013;
12
WHEREAS, on April 29, 2013, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation requesting Mediation (Dkt.
13
69); on April 30, 2013, the Court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Corley (Dkt. 70 and text entry);
14
WHEREAS, on May 6, 2013, the parties conducted a call with Magistrate Judge Corley setting
15
a settlement conference/mediation date of May 22, 2013;
16
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed that, to ensure that the Case Management
17
Conference is as efficacious as possible, the parties request that the Court continue the May 10, 2013,
18
19
20
Case Management Conference so that it occurs after the parties’ mediation; specifically, the parties
request a new Case Management Conference date of May 24, 2013 following the scheduled mediation.
IT IS SO STIPULATED
Dated: May 6, 2013
COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP
21
22
By:
/s/Jack Russo
Jack Russo
23
Attorneys for Plaintiff
INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT CORP.
24
Dated: May 6, 2013
KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP
25
By:
26
27
Attorneys for Defendant
VIRAL TOLAT
28
Computerlaw
Group LLP
computerlaw.com
/s/ Steven G. Eckhaus
Steven G. Eckhaus, pro hac vice
Stuart M. Richter
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
1
Case No. 3:12-cv-06575- JSW
ATTORNEY ATTESTATION
1
2
As required by General Order 45, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing
3
of this document has been obtained from the signatories indicated by a conformed signature (/s/)
4
within this e-filed document.
_____/s/ Jack Russo___________
Jack Russo, Esq.
5
_____
6
[PROPOSED] ORDER
7
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the parties’ joint request is
8
GRANTED and the May 10, 2013, Case Management Conference is continued and shall be held on
9
10
11
May 24
____________________, 2013.at 1:30 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 8, 2013
_____
12
___________ _____
The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Computerlaw
Group LLP
computerlaw.com
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
2
Case No. 3:12-cv-06575- JSW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?