Securities And Exchange Commission v. Beerbaum & Beerbaum Financial and Insurance Services, Inc. et al

Filing 7

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; Directing Movant to Serve on Respondents by 6/15/2012 and file proof of service by 6/18/2012. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/13/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, No. C 12-80116-MISC JSW 10 ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 11 v. For the Northern District of California United States District Court Movant, 12 13 BEERBAUM & BEERBAUM FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. and HANS N. BEERBAUM, 14 Respondents. 15 16 / 17 18 On May 8, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed a motion for 19 an order pursuant to Section 21(e)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 20 78u(e)(1). The Court HEREBY ORDERS Respondent Beerbaum & Beerbaum Financial and 21 Insurance Services, Inc. to show cause why it should not be ordered to comply with the SEC 22 Order issued on May 9, 2007 and pay to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority $15,000 23 plus interest from the date of the SEC Order until it has been paid in full. The Court ORDERS 24 Respondents Beerbaum & Beerbaum Financial and Insurance Services, Inc. and Hans N. 25 Beerbaum (collectively, “Respondents”) to show cause why they should not be ordered to 26 comply with the SEC Order issued on May 9, 2007 and pay to the Financial Industry 27 Regulatory Authority $1,741 plus interest from the date of the SEC Order until it has been paid 28 in full. The interest rate will be determined pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. 1 On May 21, 2012, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) directing 2 respondents to respond in writing by no later than June 6, 2012. Hans Beerbaum, appearing pro 3 se, wrote a letter dated June 1, 2012 requesting an extension of time to respond. The Court 4 HEREBY EXTENDS Respondents’ deadline to respond in writing to the OSC to July 6, 2012. 5 Respondents are admonished that their failure to respond to the OSC by July 6, 2012 will result 6 in the Court issuing an order requiring Respondents to pay the amounts stated above without 7 further notice. If Respondents file a response to the OSC by July 6, 2012, the SEC may file a 8 reply by no later than July 15, 2012. The Court will set a hearing on this matter if necessary at 9 a later date. The Court HEREBY ADVISES Respondents that a Handbook for Pro Se Litigants, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 which is available through the Court’s website or in the Clerk’s office, contains helpful 12 information about proceeding without an attorney. The Court also advises Respondents that 13 they also may wish to seek assistance from the Legal Help Center. Respondents may call the 14 Legal Help Center at 415-782-9000, extension 8657, or sign up on the 15th Floor of the 15 Courthouse, Room 2796, for a free appointment with an attorney who may be able to provide 16 basic legal help, but not legal representation. 17 It is FURTHER ORDERED that the SEC shall serve a copy of this Order on 18 Respondents by no later than June 15, 2012, and shall file proof of such service with the Court 19 by no later than June 18, 2012. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: June 13, 2012 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?