Feist v. RCN Corporation et al

Filing 18

ORDER RE STIPULATION IN DOCUMENT 12-3. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 6/13/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

BETSY FEIST, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

No. MC -12-80121 JSW (EDL)
ORDER

v.
RCN CORP. and PAXFIRE, INC.,
Defendants.

/

13
14

The Stipulation re Defendant Paxfire, Inc.’s Administrative Motion for Leave To File Under

15

Seal Document in Support of Opposition to Plaintiff Betsy Feist’s Motion to Quash Subpoenas to

16

Consultants and Request for Protective Order (Docket No. 12-3) is HEREBY DENIED. The

17

parties’ stipulation that “Paxfire may lodge all documents that RCN has previously designated as

18

‘Confidential’ under seal” does not appear to be in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5(a), which

19

provides that a “stipulation, or a blanket protective order that allows a party to designate documents

20

as sealable, will not suffice to allow the filing of documents under seal.” The parties shall comply

21

with Civil Local Rule 79-5.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: June 13, 2012
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge