Feist v. RCN Corporation et al

Filing 45

STIPULATION AND ORDER Continuing 32 MOTION De Novo Determination. Motion Hearing set for 11/6/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Susan Illston. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 10/16/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

DANIEL J. BERGESON, Bar No. 105439
[e-mail]
MELINDA M. MORTON, Bar No. 209373
[e-mail]
JAIDEEP VENKATESAN, Bar No. 211386
[e-mail]
BERGESON, LLP
303 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 500
San Jose, CA 95110-2712
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
ANDREW GROSSO, Esq., pro hac vice
[e-mail]
ANDREW GROSSO & ASSOCIATES
Georgetown Place
1101 Thirtieth St., NW, Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20007
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
PAXFIRE, INC.

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17

BETSY FEIST,

Misc. Case No. CV12-80135 SI (NC)

18
Plaintiff,

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

vs.
RCN CORPORATION and
PAXFIRE, INC.,
Defendants.

Underlying action pending in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of
New York, Case No. 11 CV 5436 JGK
Related cases:
3:12-cv-80119 SI (NC)
3:12-cv-80121 SI (NC)
3:12-cv-80140 SI (NC)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE CONTINUING HEARING
DATE ON EFF MOTION FOR DE NOVO
DETERMINATION
Date: October 23, 2012
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Hon. Judge Susan Illston
Courtroom 10, 19th Floor

27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONTINUING
HEARING ON EFF MOTION FOR DE NOVO DETERMINATION

Misc. Case No. CV12-80135 SI (NC)

1

Non-Parties Electronic Frontier Foundation and Peter Eckersley (“EFF”), together with

2

Defendant Paxfire, Inc. (“Defendant” or "Paxfire"), by and through their undersigned counsel,

3

hereby stipulate as follows:

4

WHEREAS on August 27, 2012, EFF noticed a Motion for De Novo Determination of

5

Dispositive Matter Referred to Magistrate Judge re [30] Order on Motion to Quash (“Motion”).

6

D.I. 32;

7
8
9
10
11
12

WHEREAS Defendant Paxfire’s Opposition to EFF’s Motion was electronically filed
(Dkt. No. 35) on September 12, 2012;
WHEREAS EFF’s Reply to the Motion was electronically filed on September 21, 2012
(Dkt. No. 38);
WHEREAS the hearing on EFF ’s Motion was reset by Clerk’s Notice from October 19,
2012 to October 23, 2012 (Dkt. No. 43);

13

WHEREAS counsel for Paxfire is not available to attend the hearing on October 23, 2012;

14

WHEREAS the Parties stipulate to moving the hearing on EFF’s Motion for De Novo

15

Determination of Dispositive Matter Referred to Magistrate Judge re [30] Order on Motion to

16

Quash from October 23, 2012 to November 6, 2012 at 9:00 AM.

17

WHEREAS this Stipulation does not affect any case management deadlines.

18
19

SO STIPULATED AND AGREED

20
21

Dated: October 12, 2012

BERGESON, LLP

22
23
24
25
26

/s/
Jaideep Venkatesan
Attorneys for Defendant
PAXFIRE, INC.
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the above signatory attests that concurrence

27

in the signing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.

28

-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONTINUING
HEARING ON EFF MOTION FOR DE NOVO DETERMINATION

Misc. CV12-80135 SI (NC)

Dated: October 12, 2012

2
3

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON,
LLP
/s/

4
5

Tenaya M Rodewald
Tenaya M Rodewald, Esq.
James M. Chadwick, Esq.

Attorneys for Non-Parties
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION and
PETER ECKERSLEY

FO

RT

H

12

_________________________________
The HonorableuSusanton
san Ills Illston
Judge S
United States District Judge
Northern District of California
E

NO

11

10/16
Dated: ________________, 2012

13

LI

10

UNIT
ED

9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

8

S

7

R NIA

6

RN

A

1

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONTINUING
HEARING ON EFF MOTION FOR DE NOVO DETERMINATION

Misc. CV12-80135 SI (NC)