Feist v. RCN Corporation et al

Filing 60

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/8/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 Misc. Case No. 12-mc-80135 SI 13 14 15 16 17 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE BETSY FEIST, Underlying Action Pending in S.D.N.Y. Case No. 11 CV 5436 JGK Plaintiff, v. RCN CORPORATION AND PAXFIRE, INC., Defendant. Related Cases: 12-mc-80119 12-mc-80121 12-mc-80140 / 18 19 This miscellaneous action arises from a motion to quash deposition and document subpoenas 20 issued to third-parties Electronic Frontier Foundation and Peter Eckersley (“EFF”) by defendant Paxfire, 21 Inc. On November 6, 2012, the Court found that EFF’s motion to quash should be granted. On 22 November 8, 2012, defendant Paxfire appealed the Court’s decision to the Ninth Circuit. On November 23 20, 2012, EFF filed a motion for sanctions, asking this Court to sanction Paxfire under Federal Rule of 24 Civil Procedure 45(c)(1) for discovery abuse. The motion for sanctions is set to be heard on Friday 25 January 11, 2013. On December 17, 2012, Paxfire filed a Suggestion of Bankruptcy, suggesting that 26 this action be stayed in light of Paxfire’s recently filed Title 11 bankruptcy petition. 27 28 1 The hearing on the motion for sanctions is hereby VACATED. EFF is Ordered to Show Cause 2 on or before January 18, 2013 why this case should not be stayed in light of Paxfire’s bankruptcy 3 petition. Paxfire may file a response to EFF’s filing on or before January 25, 2013. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: January 8, 2013 8 SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?