NML Capital, Ltd. v. The Republic of Argentina
ORDER RE BRIEFING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE ORDERResponses due by 3/29/2013. Replies due by 4/5/2013.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/18/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2013)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NML CAPITAL, LTD.,
No. CV 12-80185-MISC JSW
THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
ORDER RE BRIEFING MOTION
FOR RELIEF FROM
Now before the Court is the motion for relief filed by Plaintiff NML Capital, Ltd. from
Magistrate Judge James’ Order regarding their motion to compel discovery from Chevron
Corporation. The District Court may modify or set aside any portion of a magistrate’s ruling on
non-dispositive pre-trial motions found to be “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Fed. R.
Civ. P. 72(a); see also, e.g., Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, 951 F.2d 236, 241
(9th Cir. 1991). A ruling is clearly erroneous if the reviewing court, after considering the
evidence, is left with the “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.”
United States v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 (1948).
Having carefully reviewed the motion for relief, and considered Plaintiff’s arguments,
the Court hereby ORDERS Defendant to file a response to the objections by no later than
March 29, 2013. Should Plaintiff wish to file a reply, it shall do so by no later than April 5,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 18, 2013
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?