v. Metsagharun
Filing
28
AMENDED ORDER re 26 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on January 7, 2013. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Robert A. Mittelstaedt (State Bar No. 60359)
Caroline N. Mitchell (State Bar No. 143124)
David L. Wallach (State Bar No. 233432)
ramitteslstaedt@jonesday.com
cnmitchell@jonesDay.com
dwallach@jonesday.com
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-626-3939
Facsimile:
415-875-5700
Attorneys for Respondents
CHEVRON CORPORATION and CHEVRON U.S.A.
INC.
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
IN RE APPLICATION OF THEOPHILUS G.
METSAGHARUN, et al. FOR AN ORDER
GRANTING LEAVE TO ISSUE
SUBPOENAS FOR THE TAKING OF
DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.
1782
Case No. 12-80274 MISC JSW (KAW)
AMENDED
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING
DATE
Courtroom: 4
Judge:
Hon. Kandis A. Westmore
16
17
18
19
In accordance with Local Rule 7-12, the parties in the above-captioned action, through
their respective counsel, stipulate as follows:
20
Whereas Applicants Theophilus G. Metsagharun, Jackson Omareye, Lofty Ogbe, Bawo
21
Omadeli and Gbejule Okoturo filed an Application for Discovery Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782
22
on November 29, 2012 (the “Application”);
23
Whereas, after the parties agreed to and filed a stipulated briefing schedule and hearing
24
date on December 17, 2012, the case was reassigned, first to Judge Samuel Conti, then to Judge
25
Thelton Henderson, and finally to Judge Jeffrey White;
26
Whereas the parties each understood the reassignment orders to require the hearing to be
27
recalendared in accordance with the schedule of the judge to whom the case had been reassigned.
28
See Dkts. 21, 22 & 23 (“[a]ll hearing dates presently scheduled are vacated and motions should be
SFI-804283v1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING DATE
CASE NO. 12-MC-80274 RS (KAW)
1
2
3
renoticed for hearing before the judge to whom the case has been reassigned”);
Whereas the parties are still meeting and conferring regarding plaintiffs’ application for
discovery;
4
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT:
5
1.
6
7
8
9
The hearing for the Application set for January 17, 2013 at 11:00 a.m. and the
associated briefing schedule shall be vacated;
2.
The parties will continue to work together to agree to a new stipulated hearing date
and briefing schedule that accords with the Court’s calendar and the parties’ schedules.
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, David L. Wallach, attest that concurrence in filing this
10
document has been obtained from the other signatory.
11
Dated: January 4, 2013
JONES DAY
12
13
By: /S/ David L. Wallach
David L. Wallach
14
Counsel for Respondents
CHEVRON CORPORATION and
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
15
16
17
Dated: January 4, 2013
EARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL
18
19
By: /S/ Richard Herz
Richard Herz (pro hac vice)
20
Counsel for Applicants
THEOPHILUS G. METSAGHARUN, et
al.
21
22
23
PURSUANT TO THE FORGOING STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT:
24
The hearing and briefing schedule are vacated as set forth above.
25
26
January 7, 2013
Dated: ________________
__________________________________
The Honorable Kandis Westmore
27
28
SFI-804283v1
-2-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING DATE
CASE NO. 12-MC-80274 RS (KAW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?