Jackson v. Fenway Partners, LLC et al
Filing
49
ORDER GRANTING 47 Stipulation TO APPEAR VIA TELEPHONE AT THE HEARING ON MOTION TO TRANSFER SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 29, 2013. Counsel for Plaintiff shall supply a direct land line telephone number to this Court's Courtroom Deputy by March 22, 2013.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 3/12/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2013)
Case3:13-cv-00005-JSW Document48 Filed03/11/13 Page1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
THE TIDRICK LAW FIRM
STEVEN G. TIDRICK, SBN 224760
JOEL B. YOUNG, SBN 236662
2039 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 308
Berkeley, California 94704
Telephone: (510) 788-5100
Facsimile: (510) 291-3226
E-mail:
sgt@tidricklaw.com
E-mail:
jby@tidricklaw.com
Attorneys for Individual and Representative
Plaintiff James Jackson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JAMES JACKSON, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated,
11
12
13
14
15
16
Civil Case No.: C-13-0005 (JSW)
Removed from Superior Court of the State of
California, County of San Francisco
Civil Case No.: CGC-12-526564
Plaintiff,
v.
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION
REGARDING HEARING ON MOTION
TO TRANSFER VENUE (DOCKET NO. 6)
FENWAY PARTNERS, LLC et al.,
Defendants.
______________________________________
AND RELATED CROSS-COMPLAINT
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
[PROPOSED] ORDER
It is hereby ordered that the hearing on the Motion to Transfer Venue (Docket No. 6),
which was scheduled for March 29, 2013, is rescheduled for March 22, 2013 at ____ AM/PM
[or in the alternative, counsel for Plaintiffs is permitted to appear telephonically at the
Counsel for Plaintiffs shall provide a direct landline at which they may be
hearing on March 29, 2013]. reached by March 22, 2013.
March 12, 2013
Dated: _______________________
__________________________________
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING HEARING ON MOTION
TO TRANSFER VENUE (DOCKET NO. 6)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?