Jackson v. Fenway Partners, LLC et al

Filing 49

ORDER GRANTING 47 Stipulation TO APPEAR VIA TELEPHONE AT THE HEARING ON MOTION TO TRANSFER SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 29, 2013. Counsel for Plaintiff shall supply a direct land line telephone number to this Court's Courtroom Deputy by March 22, 2013.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 3/12/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:13-cv-00005-JSW Document48 Filed03/11/13 Page1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 THE TIDRICK LAW FIRM STEVEN G. TIDRICK, SBN 224760 JOEL B. YOUNG, SBN 236662 2039 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 308 Berkeley, California 94704 Telephone: (510) 788-5100 Facsimile: (510) 291-3226 E-mail: sgt@tidricklaw.com E-mail: jby@tidricklaw.com Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiff James Jackson UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JAMES JACKSON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Civil Case No.: C-13-0005 (JSW) Removed from Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco Civil Case No.: CGC-12-526564 Plaintiff, v. [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING HEARING ON MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE (DOCKET NO. 6) FENWAY PARTNERS, LLC et al., Defendants. ______________________________________ AND RELATED CROSS-COMPLAINT 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [PROPOSED] ORDER It is hereby ordered that the hearing on the Motion to Transfer Venue (Docket No. 6), which was scheduled for March 29, 2013, is rescheduled for March 22, 2013 at ____ AM/PM [or in the alternative, counsel for Plaintiffs is permitted to appear telephonically at the Counsel for Plaintiffs shall provide a direct landline at which they may be hearing on March 29, 2013]. reached by March 22, 2013. March 12, 2013 Dated: _______________________ __________________________________ JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING HEARING ON MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE (DOCKET NO. 6)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?