Baker v. State of California, Highway Patrol et al
Filing
26
ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE Amended Complaint; finding as moot 17 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 18 Motion to Dismiss (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/13/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (cdnS, COURT STAFF).
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
Northern District of California
3
4
GILDA BAKER
5
No. C 13-073 MEJ
Plaintiff,
v.
6
7
STATE OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY
PATROL, et al.,
8
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO
DISMISS
ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE AMENDED
COMPLAINT
9
10
Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss. Dkt. Nos. 17, 18. However,
on March 8, 2013, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 24. Under Federal Rule of Civil
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
Procedure 15, a party may amend its pleading once “as a matter of course” within “21 days after
13
service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of a motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1).
14
Thus, as no prior amended complaints have been filed, Plaintiff was entitled to file an amended
15
complaint as a matter of course under Rule 15(a). The amended complaint supersedes the original
16
complaint, which is treated as non-existent. Since Defendants’ motions are based on Plaintiff’s
17
original complaint, the Court hereby DENIES Defendants’ motions as moot.
18
However, upon review of the Amended Complaint, the Court finds Plaintiff’s allegations
19
unclear. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint WITHOUT
20
PREJUDICE. Plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint that complies with the guidelines set
21
forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). This rule requires that a complaint for relief include
22
(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction; (2) a short and plain
23
statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief; and (3) a demand for the relief
24
sought. A pleading may not simply allege a wrong has been committed and demand relief; it must
25
state the elements of the claim plainly and succinctly. Plaintiff must allege with at least some degree
26
of particularity the facts in which defendants engaged to support her claims. Jones v. Cmty. Redev.
27
Agency, 733 F.2d 646, 649 (9th Cir. 1984).
28
If Plaintiff chooses to amend the complaint, it is recommended that she either type the
1
amended complaint or handwrite it in a manner that is legible. It is also recommended that Plaintiff
2
obtain a copy of the Court’s Handbook for Litigants Without a Lawyer, which is available free of
3
charge in the Clerk’s Office, or online at http://cand.uscourts.gov/prosehandbk. This handbook
4
provides an explanation of the required components of a complaint, which include the following:
5
6
7
8
9
1. Caption page
2. Subject matter jurisdiction
3. Venue
4. Intradistrict assignment
5. Parties
6. Statement of facts
7. Claims
8. Request for relief
9. Demand for jury trial
10. Signature
10
The Court also advises Plaintiff that there are two additional resources available. First,
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
Plaintiff may wish to seek assistance from the Legal Help Center, located on the 15th Floor of the
13
Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, in Room 2796, where
14
Plaintiff may sign up for a free appointment with an attorney who may be able to provide basic legal
15
help, but not legal representation. The telephone number for scheduling an appointment with the
16
Legal Help Center is (415) 782-9000, extension 8657. Second, the San Francisco Bar Association
17
operates a lawyer referral service which may be helpful in securing pro bono counsel.
18
Consistent with the instructions in this Order, Plaintiff shall file any amended complaint by
19
April 17, 2013. Failure to file an amended complaint by April 17 shall result in the dismissal of this
20
case with prejudice.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Dated: March 13, 2013
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
United States Magistrate Judge
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?