Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. Centex Homes et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER of Dismissal of any and all allegations by all parties relating to settled underlying cases. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 04/09/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 THE AGUILERA LAW GROUP, APLC A. Eric Aguilera (SBN 192390) Kari M. Myron (SBN 158592) Jason Y. Chao, Esq. (SBN 250735) 650 Town Center Drive, Suite 100 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 T: 714-384-6600 / F: 714-384-6601 eaguilera@aguileragroup.com kmyron@aguileragroup.com jchao@aguileragroup.com 7 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, a Connecticut corporation UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO 12 13 Case No. 3:12-cv-00088-SC Hon. Samuel Conti TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, a Connecticut corporation, 14 STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL OF ANY AND ALL ALLEGATIONS BY ALL PARTIES RELATING TO SETTLED UNDERLYING CASES; [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 17 18 19 CENTEX HOMES, a Nevada partnership; NEWMEYER & DILLION, LLP, a California limited liability partnership; RGL INC., a California corporation, dba RGL FORENSICS; and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff TRAVELERS INDEMNITY 22 23 24 and N 25 designated counsel for an order dismissing, with prejudice, any and all claims as set forth in the 26 operative complaint filed in this action relating to the following underlying actions pursuant to Fed. 27 R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1): 28 1 Case No.: 3:12-cv-00088-SC STIPULATION DISMISSING ANY AND ALL ALLEGATIONS BY ALL PARTIES RELATING TO SETTLED UNDERLYING CASES; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Spicer, et al. v. Centex Homes, Inc., et al., San Bernardino County Superior Court, case No. A 2 3 4 Eskridge, et al. v. Centex Homes, Inc., et al., Riverside County Superior Court, case No. ) Bennett, et al. v. Centex Homes, et al., Placer County Superior Court case No. SCV0030222 5 6 Mir Ali, et al. v. Centex Homes, et al., San Diego County Superior Court, case No. 37-2009- 7 8 Yunker, et al. v. Centex Homes, et al., San Diego County Superior Court, case No. 37-2010- 9 10 11 Dated: April 8, 2013 THE AGUILERA LAW GROUP, APLC 12 /s/ A. Eric Aguilera A. Eric Aguilera Kari M. Myron Jason Y. Chao Attorneys for Plaintiff TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA 13 14 15 16 17 18 Dated: April 8, 2013 PAYNE & FEARS LLP 19 20 21 22 /s/: J. Kelby Van Patten _____ J. Kelby Van Patten Jeffrey M. Hayes Attorneys for Defendants CENTEX HOMES and NEWMEYER & DILLION 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 3:12-cv-00088-SC STIPULATION DISMISSING ANY AND ALL ALLEGATIONS BY ALL PARTIES RELATING TO SETTLED UNDERLYING CASES; [PROPOSED] ORDER ORDER 1 2 3 Pursuant to stipulation of Plaintiff Travelers and Defendants Centex and Newmeyer, and good cause existing therefore, 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any and all claims against Defendants, Centex and 5 Newmeyer as set forth in the operative complaint filed by Travelers in this action and relating to 6 the underlying actions known as the Spicer, Mira Loma/Eskridge, Bennett, Mir Ali, and Yunker 7 Actions are dismissed with prejudice. S UNIT ED 9 Dated: April ______, 2013 NO 11 4851-1166-4915.1 H ER LI RT 12 onti amuel C Judge S 13 FO 10 R NIA _______________________________ Hon. Samuel Conti Judge of the District Court A 9 RT U O 8 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No.: 3:12-cv-00088-SC STIPULATION DISMISSING ANY AND ALL ALLEGATIONS BY ALL PARTIES RELATING TO SETTLED UNDERLYING CASES; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?