Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. Centex Homes et al
Filing
32
STIPULATION AND ORDER of Dismissal of any and all allegations by all parties relating to settled underlying cases. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 04/09/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
THE AGUILERA LAW GROUP, APLC
A. Eric Aguilera (SBN 192390)
Kari M. Myron (SBN 158592)
Jason Y. Chao, Esq. (SBN 250735)
650 Town Center Drive, Suite 100
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
T: 714-384-6600 / F: 714-384-6601
eaguilera@aguileragroup.com
kmyron@aguileragroup.com
jchao@aguileragroup.com
7
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, a
Connecticut corporation
UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO
12
13
Case No. 3:12-cv-00088-SC
Hon. Samuel Conti
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF
CONNECTICUT, a Connecticut corporation,
14
STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL OF ANY
AND ALL ALLEGATIONS BY ALL
PARTIES RELATING TO SETTLED
UNDERLYING CASES; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
17
18
19
CENTEX HOMES, a Nevada partnership;
NEWMEYER & DILLION, LLP, a California
limited liability partnership; RGL INC., a
California corporation, dba RGL FORENSICS;
and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive,
20
Defendants.
21
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff TRAVELERS INDEMNITY
22
23
24
and N
25
designated counsel for an order dismissing, with prejudice, any and all claims as set forth in the
26
operative complaint filed in this action relating to the following underlying actions pursuant to Fed.
27
R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1):
28
1
Case No.: 3:12-cv-00088-SC
STIPULATION DISMISSING ANY AND ALL ALLEGATIONS BY ALL
PARTIES RELATING TO SETTLED UNDERLYING CASES; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
Spicer, et al. v. Centex Homes, Inc., et al., San Bernardino County Superior Court, case No.
A
2
3
4
Eskridge, et al. v. Centex Homes, Inc., et al., Riverside County Superior Court, case No.
)
Bennett, et al. v. Centex Homes, et al., Placer County Superior Court case No. SCV0030222
5
6
Mir Ali, et al. v. Centex Homes, et al., San Diego County Superior Court, case No. 37-2009-
7
8
Yunker, et al. v. Centex Homes, et al., San Diego County Superior Court, case No. 37-2010-
9
10
11
Dated: April 8, 2013
THE AGUILERA LAW GROUP, APLC
12
/s/ A. Eric Aguilera
A. Eric Aguilera
Kari M. Myron
Jason Y. Chao
Attorneys for Plaintiff TRAVELERS PROPERTY
CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA
13
14
15
16
17
18
Dated: April 8, 2013
PAYNE & FEARS LLP
19
20
21
22
/s/: J. Kelby Van Patten _____
J. Kelby Van Patten
Jeffrey M. Hayes
Attorneys for Defendants CENTEX HOMES and
NEWMEYER & DILLION
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 3:12-cv-00088-SC
STIPULATION DISMISSING ANY AND ALL ALLEGATIONS BY ALL
PARTIES RELATING TO SETTLED UNDERLYING CASES; [PROPOSED] ORDER
ORDER
1
2
3
Pursuant to stipulation of Plaintiff Travelers and Defendants Centex and Newmeyer, and
good cause existing therefore,
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any and all claims against Defendants, Centex and
5
Newmeyer as set forth in the operative complaint filed by Travelers in this action and relating to
6
the underlying actions known as the Spicer, Mira Loma/Eskridge, Bennett, Mir Ali, and Yunker
7
Actions are dismissed with prejudice.
S
UNIT
ED
9
Dated: April ______, 2013
NO
11
4851-1166-4915.1
H
ER
LI
RT
12
onti
amuel C
Judge S
13
FO
10
R NIA
_______________________________
Hon. Samuel Conti
Judge of the District Court
A
9
RT
U
O
8
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No.: 3:12-cv-00088-SC
STIPULATION DISMISSING ANY AND ALL ALLEGATIONS BY ALL
PARTIES RELATING TO SETTLED UNDERLYING CASES; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?