Meier v. Shinseki et al
Filing
45
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/13/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
TERRY L. MEIER,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff,
No. C 13-00189 WHA
v.
ERIK K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans
Affairs, E. DOUGLAS BRADSHAW, VA
Assistant General Counsel, SUZANNE C. WILL,
VA Regional Counsel for Region 18, SHEILA M.
CULLEN, Director of VA Sierra Pacific Network
(VISN 21), BRIAN J. O’NEILL, Director of VA
Northern California Health Care System,
SHANNON CASTON, VA NCHCS Privacy and
FOIA Officer, and UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA,
ORDER DISMISSING
ACTION
Defendants.
/
21
22
By order dated May 9, defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint was granted.
23
The order provided that plaintiff could file a motion to obtain leave to amend his complaint and
24
would have until May 30 to file such a motion, appending a proposed amended complaint. The
25
order further stated that if such motion was not filed by the deadline, this case would be closed.
26
The deadline has come and gone and no motion has been filed. Plaintiff Terry Meier has also
27
filed a letter stating that he “will stand on the original” complaint and requesting the Court enter
28
judgment to allow plaintiff to appeal (Dkt. No. 44).
1
2
Accordingly, the time for seeking leave to amend having passed, the action is hereby
DISMISSED. Judgment will be entered by separate order. The Clerk shall close the file.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: June 13, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?