Meier v. Shinseki et al

Filing 45

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/13/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 TERRY L. MEIER, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, No. C 13-00189 WHA v. ERIK K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, E. DOUGLAS BRADSHAW, VA Assistant General Counsel, SUZANNE C. WILL, VA Regional Counsel for Region 18, SHEILA M. CULLEN, Director of VA Sierra Pacific Network (VISN 21), BRIAN J. O’NEILL, Director of VA Northern California Health Care System, SHANNON CASTON, VA NCHCS Privacy and FOIA Officer, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION Defendants. / 21 22 By order dated May 9, defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint was granted. 23 The order provided that plaintiff could file a motion to obtain leave to amend his complaint and 24 would have until May 30 to file such a motion, appending a proposed amended complaint. The 25 order further stated that if such motion was not filed by the deadline, this case would be closed. 26 The deadline has come and gone and no motion has been filed. Plaintiff Terry Meier has also 27 filed a letter stating that he “will stand on the original” complaint and requesting the Court enter 28 judgment to allow plaintiff to appeal (Dkt. No. 44). 1 2 Accordingly, the time for seeking leave to amend having passed, the action is hereby DISMISSED. Judgment will be entered by separate order. The Clerk shall close the file. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: June 13, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?