Angell et al v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 74

ORDER APPROVING REVISED NOTICE Re: Dkt. Nos. 73, 73-2. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 1/8/15. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12

STEVEN ANGELL, and others,
Plaintiffs,

13

ORDER APPROVING REVISED
NOTICE

v.

14
15

Case No. 13-cv-00190 NC

Re: Dkt. Nos. 73, 73-2
CITY OF OAKLAND, and others,
Defendants.

16
17

The Court has reviewed plaintiffs’ revised proposed notice, Dkt. No. 73-2, and finds

18

19 that the revised proposed notice has corrected the deficiencies identified in the Court’s
20 January 5 order, Dkt. No. 72. Accordingly, the Court approves the revised form of notice
21 with the following two changes that must be made before disseminating the notice to the
22 class:
23

1. The sentence stating “The proposal, subject to the Court’s approval, is for the eight

24 Class Representatives to receive $9,000 for their service representing the Class.” must be
25 revised to state “The proposal, subject to the Court’s approval, is for each of the eight Class
26 Representatives to receive $9,000 for their service representing the Class.” See Dkt. No.
27 73-2 at 5.
28

2. The typo in the word “EXERCUSE” must be corrected. See Dkt. No. 73-2 at 2.
Case No. 13-cv-00190 NC
ORDER APPROVING REVISED
NOTICE

1

Th date of th prelimin
he
he
nary approval of the set
ttlement wi be deeme to be the date
ill
ed
e

o
ary
2 of this order, Janua 8, 2015.

3

IT IS SO OR
T
RDERED.

4

Date: January 8, 2015
y

____
__________
__________
_____
Nath
hanael M. C
Cousins
Unit States M
ted
Magistrate J
Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10
0
11
1
12
2
13
3
14
4
15
5
16
6
17
7
18
8
19
9
20
0
21
1
22
2
23
3
24
4
25
5
26
6
27
7
28
8
Case No. 13-cv-0019 NC
90
ORDER APPROVIN REVISE
R
NG
ED
NOTICE
E

2