Dedrick v. CVS Caremark, Inc.

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 07/30/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 Daniel B. Beck (SBN 63865) Beck Law, PC 2681 Cleveland Ave Santa Rosa, CA 95403 Tel: 707-576-7175 Fax: 707-576-1878 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO STIPULATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES and Proposed ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No.: C 13-00193 TEH JAZMINE (“Ochai”) DEDRICK, v. 14 15 16 CVS CAREMARK, INC, a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1 – 25, Defendants. 17 18 19 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, JAZMINE (“Ochai”) DEDRICK, requests that 20 pursuant to joint stipulation and settlement between the parties, Defendant, CVS CAREMARK, 21 INC., a Delaware Corporation, be dismissed with prejudice from the instant action. BECK LAW, P.C. 22 23 Dated: July 26, 2013 /s/ Daniel B. Beck, Esq._______ Daniel B. Beck, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: July 26, 2013 _/s/ Kent J. Sprinkle________ Kent J. Sprinkle, Esq. Attorney for Defendant 24 25 26 27 28 Request for Dismissal with Prejudice Per Stipulation Between the Parties and Order Thereon Page 1 1 2 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL: The above Request for Dismissal Pursuant to Stipulation Between the Parties and the 3 proposed Order Granting Request For Dismissal is approved and granted pursuant to the 4 stipulated request of the parties. The case is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 5 H ER erson E. Hend 12 13 N F D IS T IC T O R 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Request for Dismissal with Prejudice Per Stipulation Between the Parties and Order Thereon Page 2 FO helton Judge T RT 11 U.S. District Court Judge NO 10 The Honorable Thelton E. Henderson LI 9 30 Dated: July ___, 2013 A 8 R NIA 7 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 6 C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?