Dedrick v. CVS Caremark, Inc.
Filing
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 07/30/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2013)
1
2
3
Daniel B. Beck (SBN 63865)
Beck Law, PC
2681 Cleveland Ave
Santa Rosa, CA 95403
Tel: 707-576-7175
Fax: 707-576-1878
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT
TO STIPULATION BETWEEN THE
PARTIES and Proposed ORDER
GRANTING REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No.: C 13-00193 TEH
JAZMINE (“Ochai”) DEDRICK,
v.
14
15
16
CVS CAREMARK, INC, a Delaware
Corporation, and DOES 1 – 25,
Defendants.
17
18
19
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, JAZMINE (“Ochai”) DEDRICK, requests that
20
pursuant to joint stipulation and settlement between the parties, Defendant, CVS CAREMARK,
21
INC., a Delaware Corporation, be dismissed with prejudice from the instant action.
BECK LAW, P.C.
22
23
Dated: July 26, 2013
/s/ Daniel B. Beck, Esq._______
Daniel B. Beck, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: July 26, 2013
_/s/ Kent J. Sprinkle________
Kent J. Sprinkle, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
24
25
26
27
28
Request for Dismissal with Prejudice Per Stipulation Between the Parties and Order Thereon
Page 1
1
2
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL:
The above Request for Dismissal Pursuant to Stipulation Between the Parties and the
3
proposed Order Granting Request For Dismissal is approved and granted pursuant to the
4
stipulated request of the parties. The case is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
5
H
ER
erson
E. Hend
12
13
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Request for Dismissal with Prejudice Per Stipulation Between the Parties and Order Thereon
Page 2
FO
helton
Judge T
RT
11
U.S. District Court Judge
NO
10
The Honorable Thelton E. Henderson
LI
9
30
Dated: July ___, 2013
A
8
R NIA
7
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
6
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?