Hopkins v. Contra Costa Sheriff Department et al

Filing 9

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 5/13/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 KEVIN LAMAR HOPKINS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SHERIFF ) DEPARTMENT; SAM ROSALES; ) THOMAS NORVELL; SHERIFF DAVID ) O. LIVINGSTON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________ ) No. C 13-0205 JSW (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 18 This case was opened when Plaintiff, an inmate at the Contra Costa County Jail, 19 filed a “motion for injunction and/or further relief.” It is possible that Plaintiff intended 20 to file the motion in his currently pending case against Contra Costa County officials, 21 Hopkins v. Contra Costa County, et al., No. C 12-0813 JSW, but he did not include that 22 case number in the caption of the motion and therefore the Clerk treated the motion as a 23 complaint filed in a new case. If Plaintiff does intend to open a new case, the motion 24 does not suffice as a complaint. The motion alleges that Plaintiff is not receiving 25 orthopedic devices that are medically required, that he is being harassed by jail staff, that 26 false disciplinary charges have been levied against him, and that he has been denied 27 envelopes, paper and postage. He does not identify which of the defendants were 28 1 involved in these different alleged actions. He also does not allege when these events 2 took place. 3 The complaint is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiff shall file 4 an amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the date this order is filed. The 5 amendment must include the caption and civil case number used in this order (No. C 13- 6 0205 JSW (PR)) and the words “COURT-ORDERED FIRST AMENDED 7 COMPLAINT” on the first page. Because an amended complaint completely replaces 8 the original complaint, see Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992), 9 Plaintiff may not incorporate material from the original by reference. Failure to amend 10 within the designated time and in accordance with this order will result in the dismissal 11 of this action. 12 13 14 15 If Plaintiff intended to file the motion for injunction in his pending case, he must re-file the motion with the appropriate case number in the caption of the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 13, 2013 16 17 JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 KEVIN LAMAR HOPKINS, Case Number: CV13-00205 JSW 6 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 7 v. 8 9 10 CONTRA COSTA SHERRIFF DEPT. ET AL et al, Defendant. / 11 12 13 14 15 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on May 13, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 16 17 19 Kevin Lamar Hopkins CC12E0189 West County Detention Facility 5555 Giant Highway Richmond, CA 94806 20 Dated: May 13, 2013 18 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?