Hopkins v. Contra Costa Sheriff Department et al
Filing
9
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 5/13/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
KEVIN LAMAR HOPKINS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SHERIFF )
DEPARTMENT; SAM ROSALES;
)
THOMAS NORVELL; SHERIFF DAVID )
O. LIVINGSTON, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________ )
No. C 13-0205 JSW (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
LEAVE TO AMEND
18
This case was opened when Plaintiff, an inmate at the Contra Costa County Jail,
19
filed a “motion for injunction and/or further relief.” It is possible that Plaintiff intended
20
to file the motion in his currently pending case against Contra Costa County officials,
21
Hopkins v. Contra Costa County, et al., No. C 12-0813 JSW, but he did not include that
22
case number in the caption of the motion and therefore the Clerk treated the motion as a
23
complaint filed in a new case. If Plaintiff does intend to open a new case, the motion
24
does not suffice as a complaint. The motion alleges that Plaintiff is not receiving
25
orthopedic devices that are medically required, that he is being harassed by jail staff, that
26
false disciplinary charges have been levied against him, and that he has been denied
27
envelopes, paper and postage. He does not identify which of the defendants were
28
1
involved in these different alleged actions. He also does not allege when these events
2
took place.
3
The complaint is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiff shall file
4
an amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the date this order is filed. The
5
amendment must include the caption and civil case number used in this order (No. C 13-
6
0205 JSW (PR)) and the words “COURT-ORDERED FIRST AMENDED
7
COMPLAINT” on the first page. Because an amended complaint completely replaces
8
the original complaint, see Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992),
9
Plaintiff may not incorporate material from the original by reference. Failure to amend
10
within the designated time and in accordance with this order will result in the dismissal
11
of this action.
12
13
14
15
If Plaintiff intended to file the motion for injunction in his pending case, he must
re-file the motion with the appropriate case number in the caption of the complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 13, 2013
16
17
JEFFREY S. WHITE
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
KEVIN LAMAR HOPKINS,
Case Number: CV13-00205 JSW
6
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
7
v.
8
9
10
CONTRA COSTA SHERRIFF DEPT. ET AL
et al,
Defendant.
/
11
12
13
14
15
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on May 13, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
19
Kevin Lamar Hopkins CC12E0189
West County Detention Facility
5555 Giant Highway
Richmond, CA 94806
20
Dated: May 13, 2013
18
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?