MEI 3D, LLC v. Gunnar Optiks LLC

Filing 17

ORDER STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 5/7/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2013)

5
6

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MEI 3D, LLC

10

Attorneys for Defendant
GUNNAR OPTIKS LLC

ston

usan Ill

Judge S

RT

12

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

NO

11

UNIT
ED

9

KNOBBE MARTENS OLSEN & BEAR LLP
DAVID G. JANKOWSKI (State Bar No. 205634)
2040 Main Street, 14th Floor
Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

8

S

7

H

ER

13

N

F
D IS T
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTR I C T O

14

R NIA

4

FO

3

LI

2

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
ANNE M. ROGASKI (State Bar No. 184754)
MATTHEW J. MEYER (State Bar No. 284578)
1080 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

A

1

15

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

C

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
MEI 3D, LLC,

CASE NO. C 13-0215-SI

18
Plaintiff,
19
v.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY
NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 6-1)

20
21

GUNNAR OPTIKS LLC and DOES 1-5,
INCLUSIVE

22

Defendants.

23
It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff, MEI 3D, LLC (“MEI 3D”) and Defendant

24
25

Gunnar Optiks LLC (“Gunnar”) pursuant to Local Rule 6-1 that the time in which Gunnar may

26

answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in the above-referenced proceeding shall be

27

extended to and include June 6, 2013.

28

///
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT
MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 6-1)
CASE NO. C 13-0215-SI

-1-

1
DATED: May 6, 2013

Respectfully submitted,

2
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
3
4
By: /s/ Matthew J. Meyer

MATTHEW J. MEYER

5
6

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MEI 3D, LLC

7
8
DATED: May 6, 2013

KNOBBE MARTENS OLSEN & BEAR LLP

9
10
By: /s/ David G. Jankowski

11

DAVID G. JANKOWSKI

12

Attorneys for Defendant
GUNNAR OPTIKS LLC

13
14
15

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under

16

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from David G.

17

Jankowski.

18
19
20

DATED: May 6, 2013

Respectfully submitted,
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

21
22
23
24

By: /s/ Matthew J. Meyer

MATTHEW J. MEYER

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MEI 3D, LLC

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT
MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 6-1)
CASE NO. C 13-0215-SI

-2-