GeoTag, Inc. v. Zoosk, Inc.
Filing
152
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 150 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for 30-Day Extension of Remaining Claim Construction Deadlines filed by Zoosk, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 11/25/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 12/2/2013 02:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Claims Construction Hearing set for 12/2/2013 02:30 PM. Tutorial Hearing set for 11/18/2013 02:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/15/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
DANIEL S. MOUNT, ESQ. (CSB No. 77517)
dmount@mount.com
KEVIN M. PASQUINELLI (CSB No. 246985)
kpasquinelli@mount.com
MOUNT, SPELMAN & FINGERMAN, P.C.
RiverPark Tower, Suite 1650
333 West San Carlos Street
San Jose, CA 95110-2740
Telephone:
408.279.7000
Facsimile:
408.998.1474
6
7
8
9
DAVID R. BENNETT (PRO HAC VICE)
dbennett@directionip.com
DIRECTION IP LAW
P.O. BOX 14184
Chicago, IL 60614-0184
Telephone:
312.291.1667
Facsimile:
773.244.1070
10
Attorneys for Defendant and
Counterclaimant
ZOOSK, INC.
MOUNTAIN VIEW
12
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant
GEOTAG, INC.
CHARLENE M. MORROW (CSB No.
136411)
cmorrow@fenwick.com
PATRICK E. PREMO (CSB No. 184915)
ppremo@fenwick.com
HECTOR J. RIBERA (CSB No. 221511)
hribera@fenwick.com
KATHLEEN LU (CSB No. 267032)
klu@fenwick.com
BRIAN E. LAHTI (CSB No. 278951)
blahti@fenwick.com
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
Telephone:
650.988.8500
Facsimile:
650.938.5200
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17
GEOTAG, INC.,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
22
Case No.: 13-cv-00217-EMC
v.
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR 30-DAY
EXTENSION OF REMAINING CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES
ZOOSK, INC.,
Defendant.
Date Action Filed: September 13, 2011
Trial Date: None set
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
23
24
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff GeoTag, Inc. (“GeoTag”) and Defendant Zoosk, Inc.
25
(“Zoosk”) (collectively, the “Parties”), stipulate as recited below and jointly request that the Court
26
amend the current Claim Construction Scheduling Order [Dkt. No. 133] as set forth below.
27
28
WHEREAS, the Court, by Order dated April 2, 2013 [Dkt. No. 133], issued a scheduling
order setting forth the case schedule through claim construction;
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR 30-DAY EXTENSION OF REMAINING
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES
CASE NO.: 13-cv-00217-EMC
1
2
WHEREAS, the Court, by Order dated July 24, 2013 [Dkt. No. 146], amended that
schedule by resetting the tutorial from October 16, 2013 to October 18, 2013;
3
4
5
6
WHEREAS, GeoTag’s Supplemental Infringement Contentions were served June 24,
2013;
WHEREAS, GeoTag on August 2, 2013 agreed to provide Zoosk amended supplemental
infringement contentions;
7
WHEREAS, Zoosk has requested a thirty (30) day extension of all remaining claim
8
construction deadlines to allow GeoTag time to amend its supplemental infringement contentions
9
as discussed at the meet and confer between the parties on August 2, 2013, as well as provide
Zoosk the necessary time to review the amended supplemental infringement contentions prior to
11
claim construction;
MOUNTAIN VIEW
12
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
10
13
14
15
WHEREAS, GeoTag does not object to the extension of thirty (30) days of all remaining
claim construction deadlines;
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE and jointly request that, in view of the foregoing,
the case schedule shall be modified as set forth below:
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR 30-DAY EXTENSION OF REMAINING
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES
2
CASE NO.: 13-cv-00217-EMC
1
2
Event
Current Date
Proposed Date
3
4
Parties to submit Joint Claim Construction
8/19/2013
and Prehearing Statement
9/19/2013
5
Opening claim construction briefing by
GeoTag
9/9/2013
10/10/2013
6
Responsive claim construction briefing by
Zoosk
9/23/2013
10/24/2013
8
Reply claim construction briefing by
GeoTag
9/30/2013
10/31/2013
9
Tutorial
10/18/2013
Week of 11/18/2013 at 2:30pm
Markman Hearing and Further CMC
10/29/2013
Week of 11/29/2013
12/2/13 at 2:30 p.m.
7
10
MOUNTAIN VIEW
12
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR 30-DAY EXTENSION OF REMAINING
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES
3
CASE NO.: 13-cv-00217-EMC
1
Dated: August 14, 2013
FENWICK & WEST LLP
2
3
By: /s/ Brian E. Lahti
Brian E. Lahti
Attorneys for Defendants and
Counterclaimants
Zoosk, Inc.
4
5
6
7
Dated: August 14, 2013
MOUNT, SPELMAN & FINGERMAN, PC
8
By: /s/ Kevin Pasquinelli
Kevin Pasquinelli
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and CounterclaimDefendants
GeoTag, Inc.
9
10
13
14
15
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO
ORDERED.
21
RT
22
dwa
Judge E
24
hen
rd M. C
ER
A
H
23
DIFIE
R NIA
20
AS MO
The Honorable Edward M. ChenERED
OO D D
United States District Judge R
IT IS S
FO
19
NO
18
RT
U
O
S
17
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
LI
16
UNIT
ED
MOUNTAIN VIEW
12
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR 30-DAY EXTENSION OF REMAINING
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES
4
CASE NO.: 13-cv-00217-EMC
1
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
2
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of
3
perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.
4
5
Dated: August 14, 2013
FENWICK & WEST LLP
6
7
By: /s/ Brian E. Lahti
Brian E. Lahti
Attorneys for Defendants and
Counterclaimants
Zoosk, Inc.
8
9
10
MOUNTAIN VIEW
12
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR 30-DAY EXTENSION OF REMAINING
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES
5
CASE NO.: 13-cv-00217-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?