GeoTag, Inc. v. Zoosk, Inc.

Filing 172

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 170 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER [JOINT] FOR EXTENSION OF REMAINING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES filed by Zoosk, Inc. Claims Construction Hearing reset for 4/28/2014 02:30 PM. Tutorial Hearing reset for 4/14/2014 02:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/17/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MOUNTAIN VIEW 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 11 13 14 15 DAVID R. BENNETT (PRO HAC VICE) dbennett@directionip.com DIRECTION IP LAW P.O. BOX 14184 Chicago, IL 60614-0184 Telephone: 312.291.1667 Facsimile: 773.244.1070 JEFFREY A. TINKER (PRO HAC VICE PENDING) jtinker@winstead.com Winstead PC 500 Winstead Building 2728 N. Harwood Street Dallas, Texas 75201 JOSEPH A. GRECO (Cal. Bar No. 104476) jgreco@beckllp.com KIMBERLY P. ZAPATA (Cal. Bar No. 138291) kzapata@beckllp.com Beck, Bismonte & Finley, LLP 150 Almaden Boulevard, 10th Floor San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408.938.7900 Facsimile: 408.938.0790 CHARLENE M. MORROW (CSB No. 136411) cmorrow@fenwick.com PATRICK E. PREMO (CSB No. 184915) ppremo@fenwick.com HECTOR J. RIBERA (CSB No. 221511) hribera@fenwick.com KATHLEEN LU (CSB No. 267032) klu@fenwick.com BRIAN E. LAHTI (CSB No. 278951) blahti@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, CA 94041 Telephone: 650.988.8500 Facsimile: 650.938.5200 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant ZOOSK, INC. Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant GEOTAG, INC. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 20 GEOTAG, INC., Case No.: 13-cv-00217-EMC 21 Plaintiff, 22 v. 23 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF REMAINING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES ZOOSK, INC., 24 Defendant. Date Action Filed: September 13, 2011 Trial Date: None set 25 26 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 27 28 JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXT. OF REMAINING CLAIM CONST. DEADLINES CASE NO.: 13-cv-00217-EMC 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 and Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff GeoTag, Inc. (“GeoTag”) and 2 Defendant Zoosk, Inc. (“Zoosk”) (collectively, the “Parties”), stipulate as recited below and 3 jointly request that the Court amend the current Claim Construction Scheduling Order [Dkt. No. 4 133] as set forth below. 5 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, the Court, by Order dated April 2, 2013 [Dkt. No. 133], issued a scheduling order setting forth the case schedule through claim construction; WHEREAS, the Court, modified that schedule by orders dated July 24, 2013 [Dkt. No. 146], August 15, 2013 [Dkt. No. 152] and October 2, 2013 [Dkt. No. 164]; WHEREAS, the October 2, 2013 modification reset GeoTag’s opening claim construction briefing to December 23, 2013, Zoosk’s responsive claim construction briefing to January 6, 11 2014, and the Markman hearing to February 10, 2014; MOUNTAIN VIEW 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 10 WHEREAS, GeoTag’s trial in the case titled GeoTag, Inc. v. Frontier Communc’s Corp. 13 et al., Case No. 2:10-cv-00265-JRG (E.D. Tex. filed July 23, 2010) (Gilstrap, J.) has been reset 14 from December 2, 2013 to March 10, 2014; 15 WHEREAS, GeoTag is set to begin trial in the case titled Microsoft Corp. et al. v. 16 GeoTag, Inc., Case No. 11-cv-00175-RGA (D. Del. filed March 1, 2011) (Andrews, J.) on April 17 21, 2014; 18 19 20 WHEREAS, new counsel of record for GeoTag entered appearances on November 13, 2013 [Dkt. Nos. 167 and 168] and on December 10, 2103 [Dkt. No. 169]; WHEREAS, the Parties agree to the below extension of all remaining claim construction 21 deadlines to allow new counsel for GeoTag the necessary time to come up to speed to this action, 22 as well as, to allow the Court the benefit of the rulings from GeoTag’s trial in the Eastern District 23 of Texas; 24 25 26 27 THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE and jointly request that, in view of the foregoing, the case schedule shall be modified as set forth below: Event Opening claim construction briefing by GeoTag Current Date Proposed Date 12/23/2013 2/24/2014 28 JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXT. OF REMAINING CLAIM CONST. DEADLINES 1 CASE NO.: 13-cv-00217-EMC 1 Responsive claim construction briefing by Zoosk 1/6/2014 3/10/2014 3 Reply claim construction briefing by GeoTag 1/13/2014 3/17/2014 4 Tutorial 1/27/2014 Week of 4/14/2014 2:30 pm 5 Markman Hearing and Further CMC 2/10/2014 Week of 4/21/2014 4/28/14 2:30pm 2 6 7 8 9 10 MOUNTAIN VIEW 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXT. OF REMAINING CLAIM CONST. DEADLINES 2 CASE NO.: 13-cv-00217-EMC 1 Dated: December 13, 2013 2013 FENWICK & WEST LLP 2 3 By: /s/ Brian E. Lahti Brian E. Lahti Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant Zoosk, Inc. 4 5 6 7 BECK, BISMONTE & FINLEY, LLP Dated: December 13, 2013 8 By: /s/ Kimberly P. Zapata Kimberly P. Zapata Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant GeoTag, Inc. 9 10 13 14 15 20 RT U O 19 S DISTRICT TE C TA The Honorable Edward M. Chen United States District Judge 21 DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI AS MO 22 n M. Che LI ER A H 25 RT 24 NO 23 dward Judge E R NIA 18 FO 17 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. (as modified) S 16 UNIT ED MOUNTAIN VIEW 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 11 N F D IS T IC T O R C 26 27 28 JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXT. OF REMAINING CLAIM CONST. DEADLINES 3 CASE NO.: 13-cv-00217-EMC 1 2 3 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories. 4 5 Dated: December 13, 2013 FENWICK & WEST LLP 6 7 By: /s/ Brian E. Lahti Brian E. Lahti Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant Zoosk, Inc. 8 9 10 MOUNTAIN VIEW 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXT. OF REMAINING CLAIM CONST. DEADLINES 4 CASE NO.: 13-cv-00217-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?