GeoTag, Inc. v. Zoosk, Inc.

Filing 221

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 220 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL OF PLAINTIFFS CO-COUNSEL, MALOUF & NOCKELS, LLP, AND REQUEST FOR TERMINATION OF ELECTRONIC NOTICES filed by Geotag, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/10/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

JEFFREY A. TINKER (PRO HAC VICE)
[e-mail]
WINSTEAD PC
500 Winstead Building
2728 N. Harwood Street
Dallas, Texas 75201
JOSEPH A. GRECO (Cal. Bar No. 104476)
[e-mail]
KIMBERLY P. ZAPATA (Cal. Bar No. 138291)
[e-mail]
BECK, BISMONTE & FINLEY, LLP
150 Almaden Boulevard, 10th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 408. 938.0790
Attorney for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant GeoTag, Inc.

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14
GEOTAG, INC.,

Case No.: 13-cv-00217-EMC

15
Plaintiff,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL OF
PLAINTIFF’S CO-COUNSEL,
MALOUF & NOCKELS, LLP, AND
REQUEST FOR TERMINATION OF
ELECTRONIC NOTICES

16
v.
17
ZOOSK, INC.,
18
Defendant.
19
20

Trial Date: None Set
Date Action Filed: September 13, 2011
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

21
22

Pursuant to Local Rule 11-5(a) and Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff GeoTag, Inc. (“GeoTag”)

23

and Defendant Zoosk, Inc. (“Zoosk”) stipulate that, subject to the Court’s approval, GeoTag may,

24

and hereby does, withdraw Malouf & Nockels LLP and the following attorneys in that firm as co-

25

counsel of record in this case:

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR WITHDRAWAL OF PLAINTIFF’S COCOUNSEL

1

Case No. 13-cv-00217-EMC

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Stephen F. Malouf
[e-mail]
Jeremy C. Martin
[e-mail]
Jonathan Nockels
[e-mail]
MALOUF & NOCKELS LLP
3811 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 800
Dallas, Texas 75219
214-969-7373 (Telephone)
214-969-7648 (Facsimile)
The parties further stipulate that the above listed attorneys be terminated from the Court’s
electronic notice list.
The law firms and attorneys listed on the caption of this document as GeoTag’s counsel
shall remain counsel of record in this case.

12
SO STIPULATED.
13
14

Dated: February 9, 2015

15

BECK, BISMONTE & FINLEY, LLP
By:/s/ Joseph A. Greco
Joseph A. Greco

16

Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant GeoTag, Inc.

17
18
19

FENWICK & WEST LLP

20

By:/s/ Brian E. Lahti
Brian E. Lahti S DISTRICT
E

S

T
TA

C

RT
U
O

21

RT

ER

H

26

FO

25

en
d M. Ch
____________________________________
e Edwar
Judg
The Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge

NO

2/10/15

Dated:_________________________

LI

24

27

A

23

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

R NIA

UNIT
ED

Attorneys for Defendant Zoosk, Inc.
22

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR WITHDRAWAL OF PLAINTIFF’S COCOUNSEL

2

Case No. 13-cv-00217-EMC

1
2
3

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I attest that the concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.

4
5

Dated: February 9, 2015

6

By: /s/ Joseph A. Greco
Joseph A. Greco

7

Attorney for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant GeoTag, Inc.

8
9
10
11

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

12
I hereby certify that on February 9, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing with the
13
Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will automatically send e-mail notification
14
of such filing to all counsel who have entered an appearance in this action.
15
16
By: /s/ Joseph A. Greco_________________
Joseph A. Greco

17
18

Attorney for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant GeoTag, Inc.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR WITHDRAWAL OF PLAINTIFF’S COCOUNSEL

3

Case No. 13-cv-00217-EMC