GeoTag, Inc. v. Zoosk, Inc.
Filing
226
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 225 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS filed by Geotag, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/22/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2015)
1
2
3
JEFFREY A. TINKER (PRO HAC VICE)
jtinker@winstead.com
Winstead PC
500 Winstead Building
2728 N. Harwood Street
Dallas, Texas 75201
4
5
6
7
8
JOSEPH A. GRECO (Cal. Bar No. 104476)
jgreco@beckllp.com
KIMBERLY P. ZAPATA (Cal. Bar No. 138291)
kzapata@beckllp.com
Beck, Bismonte & Finley, LLP
150 Almaden Boulevard, 10th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Telephone: 408.938.7900
Facsimile: 408.938.0790
9
10
CHARLENE M. MORROW (CSB No.
136411)
cmorrow@fenwick.com
HECTOR J. RIBERA (CSB No. 221511)
hribera@fenwick.com
BRIAN E. LAHTI (CSB No. 278951)
blahti@fenwick.com
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
Telephone:
650.988.8500
Facsimile:
650.938.5200
Attorneys for Defendant and
Counterclaimant
ZOOSK, INC.
Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant GEOTAG, INC.
MOUNTAIN VIEW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
GEOTAG, INC.,
Case No.: 13-cv-00217-EMC
Plaintiff,
16
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ALL
CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS
v.
17
ZOOSK, INC.,
18
Defendant.
19
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
20
21
22
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that all claims and counterclaims
23
between Plaintiff GeoTag, Inc. (“GeoTag”) and Defendant Zoosk, Inc. (“Zoosk”) (collectively
24
“the parties”) in the above-captioned action have been resolved between the parties, and that the
25
terms of that resolution include, inter alia, the covenants not to sue provided by GeoTag attached
26
hereto as Exhibit A, and that all parties should bear their own fees and costs.
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties request that this Court dismiss with prejudice all claims
and counterclaims between the parties in this action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF
DISMISSAL
CASE NO.: 13-cv-00217-EMC
1
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
2
SO STIPULATED.
3
4
BECK, BISMONTE & FINLEY, LLP
Dated: July 17, 2015
5
By: /s/ Joseph A. Greco
Joseph A. Greco
Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant GeoTag, Inc.
6
7
8
9
FENWICK & WEST LLP
10
By: /s/ Brian E. Lahti
Brian E. Lahti
Attorneys for Defendant and
Counterclaimant
Zoosk, Inc.
13
14
15
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
ard M.
NO
22
_____________________________
DERED
The Honorable Edward M. Chen
SO OR
IT IS
United States District Judge
RT
23
dw
Judge E
ER
H
24
25
R NIA
21
7/22/15
Dated: __________________
Chen
FO
20
LI
19
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
18
A
16
UNIT
ED
MOUNTAIN VIEW
12
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF
DISMISSAL
2
CASE NO.: 13-cv-00217-EMC
1
2
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)
3
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I attest that the concurrence in the
4
filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.
5
6
Dated: July 17, 2015
7
By: /s/ Joseph A. Greco
Joseph A. Greco
8
9
Attorney for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant GeoTag, Inc.
10
MOUNTAIN VIEW
12
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF
DISMISSAL
3
CASE NO.: 13-cv-00217-EMC
1
2
EXHIBIT A
Covenants. GeoTag, on behalf of itself and its Affiliates, covenants and agrees, as follows:
3
1. If GeoTag, or its current or future Affiliates, sells, assigns, conveys, divests or otherwise
4
transfers title or other ownership interest in, or the right to enforce or grant relief from claims of
5
infringement of, any of the Licensed Patents to any third party (“Patent Sale”), then GeoTag and
6
such Affiliates shall ensure that such Patent Sale shall not negate, reduce, alter or otherwise affect
7
the releases, licenses, covenants and other rights that any of them have granted herein.
8
9
2. GeoTag shall take all necessary actions to bind its current and future Affiliates and
successors to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
MOUNTAIN VIEW
Assert patent infringement against Zoosk or its Affiliates, or (ii) Assert patent infringement
12
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3. Neither GeoTag nor its Affiliates shall, at any time on or after the Effective Date, (i)
11
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
10
against any of Zoosk’s or its Affiliates’ past, present and future respective direct and indirect
13
vendors, suppliers, resellers, distributors customers and end users based upon activities that are
14
subject to a release or license granted herein.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF
DISMISSAL
4
CASE NO.: 13-cv-00217-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?