GeoTag, Inc. v. Zoosk, Inc.

Filing 226

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 225 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS filed by Geotag, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/22/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 JEFFREY A. TINKER (PRO HAC VICE) jtinker@winstead.com Winstead PC 500 Winstead Building 2728 N. Harwood Street Dallas, Texas 75201 4 5 6 7 8 JOSEPH A. GRECO (Cal. Bar No. 104476) jgreco@beckllp.com KIMBERLY P. ZAPATA (Cal. Bar No. 138291) kzapata@beckllp.com Beck, Bismonte & Finley, LLP 150 Almaden Boulevard, 10th Floor San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408.938.7900 Facsimile: 408.938.0790 9 10 CHARLENE M. MORROW (CSB No. 136411) cmorrow@fenwick.com HECTOR J. RIBERA (CSB No. 221511) hribera@fenwick.com BRIAN E. LAHTI (CSB No. 278951) blahti@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, CA 94041 Telephone: 650.988.8500 Facsimile: 650.938.5200 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant ZOOSK, INC. Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant GEOTAG, INC. MOUNTAIN VIEW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 GEOTAG, INC., Case No.: 13-cv-00217-EMC Plaintiff, 16 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS v. 17 ZOOSK, INC., 18 Defendant. 19 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 20 21 22 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that all claims and counterclaims 23 between Plaintiff GeoTag, Inc. (“GeoTag”) and Defendant Zoosk, Inc. (“Zoosk”) (collectively 24 “the parties”) in the above-captioned action have been resolved between the parties, and that the 25 terms of that resolution include, inter alia, the covenants not to sue provided by GeoTag attached 26 hereto as Exhibit A, and that all parties should bear their own fees and costs. 27 28 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties request that this Court dismiss with prejudice all claims and counterclaims between the parties in this action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL CASE NO.: 13-cv-00217-EMC 1 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2 SO STIPULATED. 3 4 BECK, BISMONTE & FINLEY, LLP Dated: July 17, 2015 5 By: /s/ Joseph A. Greco Joseph A. Greco Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant GeoTag, Inc. 6 7 8 9 FENWICK & WEST LLP 10 By: /s/ Brian E. Lahti Brian E. Lahti Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant Zoosk, Inc. 13 14 15 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 ard M. NO 22 _____________________________ DERED The Honorable Edward M. Chen SO OR IT IS United States District Judge RT 23 dw Judge E ER H 24 25 R NIA 21 7/22/15 Dated: __________________ Chen FO 20 LI 19 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 18 A 16 UNIT ED MOUNTAIN VIEW 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 11 N F D IS T IC T O R C 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 2 CASE NO.: 13-cv-00217-EMC 1 2 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3) 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I attest that the concurrence in the 4 filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories. 5 6 Dated: July 17, 2015 7 By: /s/ Joseph A. Greco Joseph A. Greco 8 9 Attorney for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant GeoTag, Inc. 10 MOUNTAIN VIEW 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 3 CASE NO.: 13-cv-00217-EMC 1 2 EXHIBIT A Covenants. GeoTag, on behalf of itself and its Affiliates, covenants and agrees, as follows: 3 1. If GeoTag, or its current or future Affiliates, sells, assigns, conveys, divests or otherwise 4 transfers title or other ownership interest in, or the right to enforce or grant relief from claims of 5 infringement of, any of the Licensed Patents to any third party (“Patent Sale”), then GeoTag and 6 such Affiliates shall ensure that such Patent Sale shall not negate, reduce, alter or otherwise affect 7 the releases, licenses, covenants and other rights that any of them have granted herein. 8 9 2. GeoTag shall take all necessary actions to bind its current and future Affiliates and successors to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. MOUNTAIN VIEW Assert patent infringement against Zoosk or its Affiliates, or (ii) Assert patent infringement 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3. Neither GeoTag nor its Affiliates shall, at any time on or after the Effective Date, (i) 11 F ENWICK & W EST LLP 10 against any of Zoosk’s or its Affiliates’ past, present and future respective direct and indirect 13 vendors, suppliers, resellers, distributors customers and end users based upon activities that are 14 subject to a release or license granted herein. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 4 CASE NO.: 13-cv-00217-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?