Easton-Bell Sports, Inc v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company
Filing
39
ORDER GRANTING Stipulated Request to Continue the Deadline for Completing ADR and Amend Scheduling Order 38 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/6/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2013)
LEE TRAN & LIANG APLC
1 Enoch H. Liang (SBN 212324)
enoch.liang@ltlattorneys.com
2 James M. Lee (SBN 192301)
james.lee@ltlattorneys.com
3 Lisa Chin (SBN 259793)
lisa.chin@ltlattorneys.com
4 702 Marshall Street, Suite 411
5 Redwood City, California
Telephone: (650) 241-2140
6 Facsimile: (213) 612-3773
7 Attorneys for Plaintiff
Easton-Bell Sports, Inc.
8
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
9 Gregory S. Gilchrist (SBN 111536)
ggilchrist@kilpatricktownsend.com
10 Two Embarcadero Center, Eighth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
11 Telephone: 415-576-0200
Facsimile: 415-576-0300
12
13
14
15
16
William Brewster (pro hac vice)
bbrewster@kilpatricktownsend.com
Jessica A. Pratt (pro hac vice)
japratt@kilpatricktownsend.com
1100 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2800
Atlanta, GA 30309
Telephone: 404-815-6500
Facsimile: 404-815-6555
17 Attorneys for Defendant
E.I. de Pont de Nemours and Company
18
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
EASTON-BELL SPORTS, INC. a Delaware )
)
22 corporation,
)
)
23
Plaintiff,
)
)
24
v.
)
)
25
)
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND
)
26
COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, aka
)
DUPONT, and DOES 1 through 10,
)
27
)
Case No.: 3:13-cv-00283-NC
STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE
THE DEADLINE FOR COMPLETING
ADR AND TO AMEND SCHEDULING
ORDER WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER
Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins
28
STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR COMPLETING ADR AND TO AMEND
SCHEDULING ORDER WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER
Defendants.
1
2 E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND
3
COMPANY, a Delaware corporation,
4
5
v.
Counterclaim-Plaintiff,
6 EASTON-BELL SPORTS, INC a Delaware
7
8
corporation,
Counterclaim-Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR COMPLETING ADR AND TO AMEND
SCHEDULING ORDER WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, this Stipulated Request is entered into by and between
2 Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. (“Easton-Bell”), and
3 Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”) by and
4 through their respective counsel.
5
1. The parties have met and conferred and propose (a) an extension of the deadline to
6 complete the Alternative Dispute Resolution process of Early Neutral Evaluation and (b)
7 amendment to the Case Management Scheduling Order as set forth below.
8
2. The deadline for completing the Alternative Dispute Resolution process of Early Neutral
9 Evaluation currently is set for August 5, 2013, as requested by the parties (Dkt. No. 37).
10
3. The Court entered the Case Management Scheduling Order on May 1, 2013 (Dkt. No.
11 33).
12
4. The parties have met and conferred and propose (a) continuing the deadline for
13 completing Alternative Dispute Resolution to August 26, 2013 and (b) amending the Case
14 Management Scheduling Order as follows:
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Item
Completion of Non-Expert
Discovery
Plaintiff’s disclosure of expert
witness opinions
Defendant’s disclosure of expert
testimony and reports
Close of expert discovery
Original Deadline in Case
Management Report
(Dkt. No. 33)
September 6, 2013
Amended Deadline
October 30, 2013
September 27, 2013
November 20, 2013
October 28, 2013
December 20, 2013
November 27, 2013
January 15, 2014
22
23
5. The parties believe good cause exists for these amendments because they have made
24 significant progress in working toward a potential negotiated settlement, and anticipate that they
25 will be in a position to execute an agreement prior to August 26, 2013. The parties’ proposed
26 deadlines will not affect the Court’s dispositive motion hearing deadline, which will remain as
27 previously set (February 5, 2014).
28
-1STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR COMPLETING ADR AND TO AMEND
SCHEDULING ORDER WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Court enter an Order adopting the
2 deadlines suggested herein.
3
Respectfully Submitted,
4
5
DATED: August 5, 2013
6
LEE TRAN & LIANG APLC
/s/ Enoch H. Liang
Enoch H. Liang
Attorney for Plaintiff Easton-Bell Sports, Inc.
7
8
9
DATED: August 5, 2013
10
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
/s/ Jessica A. Pratt
Jessica A. Pratt
Attorney for Defendant E.I. du Pont de Nemours and
Company
11
12
13
14
15
23
Nathanael M. Cousins
United States MagistrateED
Judge
ANT
NO
24
GR
RT
ER
H
25
thanael
Judge Na
26
M. Cousin
R NIA
22
RT
U
O
21
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
_________________________________
s
FO
20
DATED: ________________, 2013
August 6
LI
19
A
18
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
17
UNIT
ED
16
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
27
28
-2STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR COMPLETING ADR AND TO AMEND
SCHEDULING ORDER WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
ECF ATTESTATION
I, Jessica A. Pratt, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to
file the parties’ Joint Motion to Continue Deadline for Completing ADR and to Amend
Scheduling Order with [PROPOSED] Order. In compliance with Civil Rule 5.1, I hereby attest
6 that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Lisa Chin. I declare
7 under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
8
Executed this 5th day of August 2013.
9
10
11
12
/s/ Jessica A. Pratt
Jessica A. Pratt
Attorney for Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR COMPLETING ADR AND TO AMEND
SCHEDULING ORDER WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?