Muller et al v. Auto Mission, LTD et al
Filing
14
ORDER re 13 DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 03/14/2013. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
ROBERT P. MULLER, an individual,
No. 13-cv-00304-NC
MIANI, an individual, and on behalf of the
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME
12 CESAR MIANI, an individual, YOLANDA
13 general public,
14
15
Plaintiffs,
Re: Dkt. No. 13
v.
16 AUTO MISSION, LTD., a corporation, dba
Hayward Toyota; TOYOTA MOTOR
17 CREDIT CORPORATION, a corporation;
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
and DOES 1 through 20, Inclusive,
Defendants.
On February 15, 2013, defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation filed a motion to
compel arbitration which is set for hearing on April 3, 2013. Dkt. No. 5. On February 25,
defendant Auto Mission Ltd. filed a joinder in the motion. Dkt. No. 12. The deadline to
file any opposition to the motion was March 1, 2013. On March 14, 2013, plaintiffs
submitted a request for an extension of time to submit their opposition for the reason that
the response date was inadvertently miscalendared. Dkt. No. 13. Plaintiffs’ request is not
accompanied by a declaration or a proposed order as required by the applicable local rules,
and fails to describe the efforts plaintiffs have made to obtain a stipulation to the time
28
Case No. 13-cv-00304 NC
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME
L
(
t
rt
arging or sh
hortening time
1 change. See Civ. L.R. 6-1(b) (“A request for a Cour order enla
m
ritten stipul
lation pursu to Civi L.R. 6-2 o motion p
uant
il
or
pursuant to C
Civil
2 may be made by wr
3.”);
.R.
a
o
me
e
nied
3 L.R. 6-3 Civ. L. 6-3(a) (a motion to change tim “must be accompan by a
d
aration”). Accordingly the Court denies with
A
y,
hout prejud
dice
4 proposed order and by a decla
fs’
f
nsion of tim for failure to comply with the lo rules.
me
e
y
ocal
5 plaintiff request for an exten
fs
bmit
r
ompliance w the req
with
quirements of Civil L.R 6-2
R.
6 Plaintiff may resub their request in co
T
n
c
n
ught
aintiffs.
7 or Civil L.R. 6-3. The motion must state the specific extension of time sou by pla
8
IT IS SO OR
T
RDERED.
9
Date: March 14, 2013
10
0
____
__________
__________
_____
Nath
hanael M. C
Cousins
Unit States M
ted
Magistrate J
Judge
11
1
12
2
13
3
14
4
15
5
16
6
17
7
18
8
19
9
20
0
21
1
22
2
23
3
24
4
25
5
26
6
27
7
28
8
Case No.13-cv-0030 NC
04
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
R
G
EXTENS
SION OF TI
IME
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?