Muller et al v. Auto Mission, LTD et al

Filing 14

ORDER re 13 DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 03/14/2013. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 ROBERT P. MULLER, an individual, No. 13-cv-00304-NC MIANI, an individual, and on behalf of the ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 12 CESAR MIANI, an individual, YOLANDA 13 general public, 14 15 Plaintiffs, Re: Dkt. No. 13 v. 16 AUTO MISSION, LTD., a corporation, dba Hayward Toyota; TOYOTA MOTOR 17 CREDIT CORPORATION, a corporation; 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 and DOES 1 through 20, Inclusive, Defendants. On February 15, 2013, defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation filed a motion to compel arbitration which is set for hearing on April 3, 2013. Dkt. No. 5. On February 25, defendant Auto Mission Ltd. filed a joinder in the motion. Dkt. No. 12. The deadline to file any opposition to the motion was March 1, 2013. On March 14, 2013, plaintiffs submitted a request for an extension of time to submit their opposition for the reason that the response date was inadvertently miscalendared. Dkt. No. 13. Plaintiffs’ request is not accompanied by a declaration or a proposed order as required by the applicable local rules, and fails to describe the efforts plaintiffs have made to obtain a stipulation to the time 28 Case No. 13-cv-00304 NC ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME L ( t rt arging or sh hortening time 1 change. See Civ. L.R. 6-1(b) (“A request for a Cour order enla m ritten stipul lation pursu to Civi L.R. 6-2 o motion p uant il or pursuant to C Civil 2 may be made by wr 3.”); .R. a o me e nied 3 L.R. 6-3 Civ. L. 6-3(a) (a motion to change tim “must be accompan by a d aration”). Accordingly the Court denies with A y, hout prejud dice 4 proposed order and by a decla fs’ f nsion of tim for failure to comply with the lo rules. me e y ocal 5 plaintiff request for an exten fs bmit r ompliance w the req with quirements of Civil L.R 6-2 R. 6 Plaintiff may resub their request in co T n c n ught aintiffs. 7 or Civil L.R. 6-3. The motion must state the specific extension of time sou by pla 8 IT IS SO OR T RDERED. 9 Date: March 14, 2013 10 0 ____ __________ __________ _____ Nath hanael M. C Cousins Unit States M ted Magistrate J Judge 11 1 12 2 13 3 14 4 15 5 16 6 17 7 18 8 19 9 20 0 21 1 22 2 23 3 24 4 25 5 26 6 27 7 28 8 Case No.13-cv-0030 NC 04 ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR R G EXTENS SION OF TI IME 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?