Muller et al v. Auto Mission, LTD et al
Filing
21
ORDER GRANTING Stipulation 20 . Initial Case Management Conference continued to 5/29/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 4/3/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2013)
1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
2
3
4
5
6
7
A Limited Liability Partnership
Including Professional Corporations
ANNA S. McLEAN, Cal. Bar No. 142233
amclean@sheppardmullin.com
LAI L. YIP, Cal. Bar No. 258029
lyip@sheppardmullin.com
CHARLOTTE O. CUNNINGHAM, Cal. Bar No. 287222
ccunningham@sheppardmullin.com
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: 415.434.9100
Facsimile: 415.434.3947
8 Attorneys for Defendant
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
(San Francisco Division)
13
ROBERT P. MULLER, an individual,
Case No. 3:13-cv-00304-NC
YOLANDA MIANI, an individual, and
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND ORDER
14 CESAR MIANI, an individual,
15 on behalf of the general public,
Plaintiffs,
16
17
Judge: Hon. Nathanael Cousins
v.
18 AUTO MISSION, LTD., a corporation
doing business as HAYWARD
19 TOYOTA; TOYOTA MOTOR
CREDIT CORPORATION, a
20 corporation; and DOES 1 through 20,
inclusive,
21
Date: April 24, 2013
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Crtrm: A, 15th Fl.
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date
August 31, 2012
None Set
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMRH:408227268.1
Case No. 3:13-cv-00304-NC
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
STIPULATION
1
2
WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference (“CMC”) is presently set for
3 April 24, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.;
4
WHEREAS, the hearing on Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s (“TMCC’s”)
5 Motion to Compel Arbitration is presently set for April 17, 2013 at 1:00 p.m.;
6
WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and agree that it would be in
7 the best interests of the parties and the Court to continue the CMC until after the
8 Court is likely to have ruled on TMCC’s motion to compel, as many of the issues to
9 be addressed at the CMC, such as a discovery, pretrial, and trial schedule, may be
10 mooted by the Court’s ruling;
11
THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, the parties through their
12 undersigned counsel stipulate that the Case Management Conference is continued
13 from April 24, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. to May 29, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.
14 Dated: April 2, 2013
15
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON
LLP
16
By
17
18
19
20 Dated: April 2, 2013
21
/s/ Anna S. McLean
ANNA S. McLEAN
Attorneys for Defendant
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
KOLAR & ASSOCIATES
LLP
22
By
23
24
25
/s/ Michelle Burr
MICHELLE BURR
Attorneys for Defendant
AUTO MISSION, LTD dba HAYWARD TOYOTA
26
27
28
SMRH:408227268.1
Case No. 3:13-cv-00304-NC
-1STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
2 Dated: April 2, 2013
3
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT G. PATRICK, A PLC
4
By
5
6
7
/s/ Robert G. Padrick
ROBERT G. PADRICK
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ROBERT P. MULLER, CESAR MIANI and
YOLANDA MIANI
8
9 IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
TED
GRAN
_______________________________
13
usins
RT
ER
16
17
A
H
15
FO
14
LI
NO
. Co
HonorableeNathanael Cousins
thanael M
NaMagistrate Judge
udg
United JStates
R NIA
April 3, 2013
12 Dated: _________________
UNIT
ED
11
RT
U
O
10
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMRH:408227268.1
Case No. 3:13-cv-00304-NC
-2STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CERTIFICATION
1
2
I, Anna S. McLean, am the ECF User whose identification and password are
3 being used to file this STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
4 CONFERENCE. Pursuant to General Order 45, section X.B, I attest that Michelle
5 Burr and Robert G. Padrick have concurred in this filing.
6 Dated: April 2, 2013
7
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON
LLP
8
By
9
10
11
/s/ Anna S. McLean
ANNA S. McLEAN
Attorneys for Defendant
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMRH:408227268.1
Case No. 3:13-cv-00304-NC
-3STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?