Banta v. City of Walnut Creek, California et al
Filing
9
ORDER granted 8 MOTION to Continue CMC of August 9, 2013 filed by Anthony J. Banta. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 9/6/2013 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/10/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2013)
1
2
3
4
Larry A. Peluso, Esq. (SBN: 281380)
499 North Canon Drive, 4th Floor
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Telephone: (310) 887-3600
Facsimile: (310) 878-0187
pelusolaw@gmail.com
5
Attorney for Plaintiff, ANTHONY J. BANTA
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY J. BANTA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
15
16
FOUR WALNUT CREEK POLICE
OFFICERS, et al.,
17
18
19
20
21
22
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.
3:13-cv-00342-CRB
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
SERVE PROCESS TO AUGUST 24,
2013
Complaint filed January 24, 2013
CMC Date: September 6, 2013
Time:
8:30 AM
Courtroom: 6
On July 9, 2013, Plaintiff requested this court to extend the time for service of
23
24
25
process in this case until August 24, 2013.
Plaintiff explained that prosecution of this case has been delayed by the filing
26
of a probate petition for appointment of an administrator of the estate of the
27
28
Decedent and that letters of appointment have not yet issued.
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS TO AUGUST 24, 2013
continued to September 6, 2013.
7
11
J
ER
H
10
RT
9
. Breyer
arles R
udge Ch
NO
8
____________________________
DERED
Honorable Charles R. Breyer
SO OR
IT IS
Senior District Judge
U.S. District Court
R NIA
DATED: July 10, 2013
6
UNIT
ED
5
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
4
FO
3
extended to August 24, 2013 and the Case Management Conference will be
LI
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for service of process in this case is
A
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS TO AUGUST 24, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?