Banta v. City of Walnut Creek, California et al

Filing 9

ORDER granted 8 MOTION to Continue CMC of August 9, 2013 filed by Anthony J. Banta. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 9/6/2013 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/10/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Larry A. Peluso, Esq. (SBN: 281380) 499 North Canon Drive, 4th Floor Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Telephone: (310) 887-3600 Facsimile: (310) 878-0187 pelusolaw@gmail.com 5 Attorney for Plaintiff, ANTHONY J. BANTA 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY J. BANTA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 15 16 FOUR WALNUT CREEK POLICE OFFICERS, et al., 17 18 19 20 21 22 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:13-cv-00342-CRB ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO SERVE PROCESS TO AUGUST 24, 2013 Complaint filed January 24, 2013 CMC Date: September 6, 2013 Time: 8:30 AM Courtroom: 6 On July 9, 2013, Plaintiff requested this court to extend the time for service of 23 24 25 process in this case until August 24, 2013. Plaintiff explained that prosecution of this case has been delayed by the filing 26 of a probate petition for appointment of an administrator of the estate of the 27 28 Decedent and that letters of appointment have not yet issued. ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS TO AUGUST 24, 2013 continued to September 6, 2013. 7 11 J ER H 10 RT 9 . Breyer arles R udge Ch NO 8 ____________________________ DERED Honorable Charles R. Breyer SO OR IT IS Senior District Judge U.S. District Court R NIA DATED: July 10, 2013 6 UNIT ED 5 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 4 FO 3 extended to August 24, 2013 and the Case Management Conference will be LI 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for service of process in this case is A 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS TO AUGUST 24, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?