Howard v. Haw et al

Filing 5

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 7/1/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 6/18/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JOHN HOWARD, 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 Plaintiff, Case No.: 13-cv-343 JSC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 12 13 14 JEFFREY HAW, and CAROL D. SMITH, Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 This civil action was filed on January 24, 2013. On May 6, 2013, the Court issued an Order directing Plaintiff to serve the Defendants as he had yet to do so. (Dkt. No. 4.) Plaintiff was given until June 3, 2013 to file proof of service of the Summons and Complaint on Defendants. To date, Plaintiff has not filed proof of service or communicated with the Court in any way. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 based on Plaintiff’s failure to serve Defendant in accordance with the Court’s order. Plaintiff shall submit a written response to this Order by July 1, 2013 showing cause as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 Dated: June 18, 2013 _________________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?